Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Run Defense is historically bad


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Why is Evero the only one n the building that gets a pass for his contributions?  The defense flat out sucks.  Yes guys are hurt, but that’s the job.  Every team has injuries every year and we’re at the point where every single team ever has been better on the defensive side of the ball.

It takes more than injury to accomplish that feat.

I'm not giving him a pass per se, but it's hard to run an effective 3-4 without a legit NT. We've never had the personnel to run that scheme effectively, but it is his defense and he's responsible partly for how they have played and his schemes. Can't blame him for injuries or lack of the right players to fit the 3-4, but that soft, prevent D is all his to own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Why is Evero the only one n the building that gets a pass for his contributions?  The defense flat out sucks.  Yes guys are hurt, but that’s the job.  Every team has injuries every year and we’re at the point where every single team ever has been better on the defensive side of the ball.

It takes more than injury to accomplish that feat.

Because they absolutely gutted his unit to prop up Young and then he's had injuries to compound things. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, csx said:

3-4 doesn't necessarily have to go. That's just reactionary. The leagues top defenses are dominated by the 3-4.

Dominated? I swear y'all just make poo up on here. 

Eagles: 3-4

Titans: 3-4

49ers: 4-3

Texans: 4-3

Chiefs: 4-3

Dolphins: 3-4

Jets: 4-3

Broncos: 3-4

Steelers: 3-4

Packers: 4-3

Commanders: 4-3

Raiders: 4-3

Lions: 4-3

image.png.90ec01fc81622959dc1757514ab75dc4.png

 

 

Edited by ProcessBlue2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The injury excuse is starting to wear thin with me. They’ve lost a couple marquee names but not a long list of them. They shouldn’t be historic levels of bad. 
 

a number of vets are having the worst season of their careers here

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...