Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Panthers Announce Four Moves Including LB Trevin Wallace To IR


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Explain to me how his wasn’t anything but a disaster?

XL is a good rookie - but a rookie. He needs wrist surgery, but he's had a promising campaign 

Brooks yeah. That was a mistake.

Wallace was starting to look decent. But injuries happen.

Sanders looks very good so far.

Smith-Wade has had a couple nice plays and seems like good depth.

I don't think this is a failure of a draft class at all, still too early to tell, but some promising players. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

XL is a good rookie - but a rookie. He needs wrist surgery, but he's had a promising campaign 

Brooks yeah. That was a mistake.

Wallace was starting to look decent. But injuries happen.

Sanders looks very good so far.

Smith-Wade has had a couple nice plays and seems like good depth.

I don't think this is a failure of a draft class at all, still too early to tell, but some promising players. 

xl- 40 catches 400ish yards   I guess thats promising, some games he makes it looks easy to get open but the drops have to be cleaned up

Brooks - LOL at that trade up/pick. 

Wallace - Not even sure what to think, big athletic project that has made a couple of plays but looks lost a lot of the time. 

Sanders - Hell yeah thats the slam dunk of the draft

 

All in all its probably a C draft at best as it stands now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chubba had a good season in 2023. He's having a good-great 2024. I understand why Brooks was taken in 2nd round. Getting a back that talented on round 2 is a steal. But, the injury thing couldn't be overlooked. This team had no chance to make the playoffs by the time he was activated. We didn't need JB this season.

I would have made 2024 a red-shirt season for him; and wouldn't have had him take a snap until 2025 to give him an entire season to heal. That doesn't mean that he couldn't have hurt reinjured the knee in 2025, but taking the 2024 season off would have given him approximately 18 months off to recover from the original ACL injury.

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Chubba had a good season in 2023. He's having a good-great 2024. I understand why Brooks was taken in 2nd round. Getting a back that talented on round 2 is a steal. But, the injury thing couldn't be overlooked. This team had no chance to make the playoffs by the time he was activated. We didn't need JB this season.

I would have made 2024 a red-shirt season for him; and wouldn't have had him take a snap until 2025 to give him an entire season to heal. That doesn't mean that he couldn't have hurt reinjured the knee in 2025, but taking the 2024 season off would have given him approximately 18 months off to recover from the original ACL injury.

Whats the point of that then?  You waste a year on his deal and he is in no way shape or form some generational talent.  I mean there are 4 dudes coming out this year better then him.  trading up for an already injured RB has to be the dumbest thing I can thing of in recent memory outside of not trading Burns and not picking cj.   But hey we really should the cowboys a thing or two

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Whats the point of that then?  You waste a year on his deal and he is in no way shape or form some generational talent.  I mean there are 4 dudes coming out this year better then him.  trading up for an already injured RB has to be the dumbest thing I can thing of in recent memory outside of not trading Burns and not picking cj.   But hey we really should the cowboys a thing or two

I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc

They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise.

Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

xl- 40 catches 400ish yards   I guess thats promising, some games he makes it looks easy to get open but the drops have to be cleaned up

Brooks - LOL at that trade up/pick. 

Wallace - Not even sure what to think, big athletic project that has made a couple of plays but looks lost a lot of the time. 

Sanders - Hell yeah thats the slam dunk of the draft

 

All in all its probably a C draft at best as it stands now

I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term.

Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards.

Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress.

We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds.

So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Trevin, think his ceiling is high and he's got some grit.  He was a bit further along than expected in a few respects from a development standpoint.  Same goes for S-W and Sanders.  And I consider our priority UDFA for Coker a late 7th (even though we waived and brought him back).   The draft wasn't bad, but the top of it is just really frustrating yet again.    

We had some pretty glaring fits staring us in the face to pick at the top.  I mean, imagine Ladd at 32 and Frazier/Sainristil at 46, this could've easily been a home run draft.  But Xavier and Brooks rubbed people the wrong way, and seems to still be the case.  Especially when one has a dropping problem and the other injured the same knee and now looks like a question mark as our future RB.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I liked Trevin, think his ceiling is high and he's got some grit.  He was a bit further along than expected in a few respects from a development standpoint.  Same goes for S-W and Sanders.  And I consider our priority UDFA for Coker a late 7th (even though we waived him and brought back).   The draft wasn't bad, but the top of it is just really frustrating yet again.    

We had some pretty glaring fits staring us in the face to pick at the top.  I mean, imagine Ladd at 32 and Frazier/Sainristil at 46, this could've easily been a home run draft. 

It's hard to argue with your logic. Ladd seems tailor made to play in a system with a QB like BY; and getting a franchise center in round2 would have given us easily one of the top 10 interior lines...if not top 10 offensive lines...in the NFL.

Edited by SCO96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What an awful offseason they had. Wasted so much money in free agency and got so little. Their best rookie was undrafted as a WR. First round was a WR who body catches or has the dropsies. Second round is an injury prone RB who is on IR again. Wallace was meh and now also injured. Sanders is OK for a 3rd, at least when you compare him to the other picks. 

Talent evaluation and team building continue to be an issue with anyone working for the Panthers so nothing new since Tepper showed up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SCO96 said:

Chubba had a good season in 2023. He's having a good-great 2024. I understand why Brooks was taken in 2nd round. Getting a back that talented on round 2 is a steal. But, the injury thing couldn't be overlooked. This team had no chance to make the playoffs by the time he was activated. We didn't need JB this season.

I would have made 2024 a red-shirt season for him; and wouldn't have had him take a snap until 2025 to give him an entire season to heal. That doesn't mean that he couldn't have hurt reinjured the knee in 2025, but taking the 2024 season off would have given him approximately 18 months off to recover from the original ACL injury.

Getting a good RB in the second round isn't a steal, it's the average position to get a good RB if anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I liked Trevin, think his ceiling is high and he's got some grit.  He was a bit further along than expected in a few respects from a development standpoint.  Same goes for S-W and Sanders.  And I consider our priority UDFA for Coker a late 7th (even though we waived him and brought back).   The draft wasn't bad, but the top of it is just really frustrating yet again.    

We had some pretty glaring fits staring us in the face to pick at the top.  I mean, imagine Ladd at 32 and Frazier/Sainristil at 46, this could've easily been a home run draft.  But Xavier and Brooks rubbed people the wrong way, and seems to still be the case.  Especially when one has a dropping problem and the other injured the same knee and now looks like a question mark as our future RB.  

I think DC was wanting a X WR to play the Evans role in his offense and XL fit that role the best based on where we were drafting. Ladd would have been similar to AT or DJ (at the time). I don’t really agree with the process. Personally I’d take the best players and then build an offense for them (especially on a roster as weak as ours). I got nothing on Brooks other than DC wanting to run the ball, but there were much better ways of getting a RB2 than that…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Getting a good RB in the second round isn't a steal, it's the average position to get a good RB if anything. 

JB had a first round grade in the eyes of a lot scouts based on HIS TALENT LEVEL. If not for the injury he would have gone higher in the draft, possibly between the middle and the end of round 1. To get him just before the 50th pick is a steal. He'd be on a 4 year deal. You can't even renegotiate until the end of the season 3. You're basically paying him nothing for 3 seasons.

I don't buy into all back are interchangeable. No they're not. You have average backs, good backs, then your great-exceptional backs. The latter category doesn't grow on trees. If a back is special it pays to keep them. The key is knowing the difference between the first two categories and the third one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...