Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Time to draft a running back?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

TB had White coming off a high volume year and Sean Tucker as a solid backup. I think they’re happy they took Bucky in the 5th. 

And we have 9 picks as is. Could end up with 10-11 by the draft.

There really isn’t a position I’m all bent out of shape with drafting/not drafting. The team needs help nearly everywhere. Worst depth in the league.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I maintain the same position I have had for YEARS.  We should never in reality be paying FA RBs or extending contracts to big money.  We should steadily be drafting RB year after year....and investing the real money elsewhere. 

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NAS said:

I like it but I think we can get him in 7th round.

Maybe. I think his stock will continue to rise through the playoffs to where he’s potentially taken early Day 3. 

Edited by ECHornet
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers org has an obsession with putting money into the RB spot.  In terms of guaranteed money, the Panthers under Tepper have basically been committed to always have top 10 money in a RB. 

CMC to Sanders to Hubbard.  That's not worked out very well in the Tepper era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, countryboi said:

running backs are so undervalued that you should drafting one at least every other year or so. it cost almost nothing to dreft a guy on day 3

Especially when it’s one of the deepest positions in the draft 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

I maintain the same position I have had for YEARS.  We should never in reality be paying FA RBs or extending contracts to big money.  We should steadily be drafting RB year after year....and investing the real money elsewhere. 

 

I’m ok with one extension for a RB you draft while you groom the next one to take over as RB1

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RBs have a high level of attrition. I'm often in favor of finding some fresh legs mid-late draft who can either:

- Be a change of pace back

- Can catch the ball

- Are good with pass protection 

We did get Chuba as a fourth round pick, so there's precedent. Also, we need Brooks insurance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CRA said:

Panthers org has an obsession with putting money into the RB spot.  In terms of guaranteed money, the Panthers under Tepper have basically been committed to always have top 10 money in a RB. 

CMC to Sanders to Hubbard.  That's not worked out very well in the Tepper era. 

Overall I agree but Chuba will probably be outside the top 10 at his position by the end of the offseason, and his contract is not unreasonable and I think he played himself into it.

We do need to go get another back in the draft quite probably. We can't count on JB ever coming back, really, and if he does and excels, we'd be in a good position anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CBird said:

Give me Omarion Hampton or DJ Giddons from KSU.  brooks was a huge wasted pick and they should cut bait on him and Miles Sanders.

Cut a rookie on IR?  That doesn't make much sense.  He showed brief flashes, why move on now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the draft is this loaded, there will be an UDFA available--we have so many needs--a rental could be an UDFA or a 1-year contract signing.  But I see a lot of talent and value at RB this year.  Lotta ways to approach the problem--not one answer, and if anyone comes across as there is, he is full of shite.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...