Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young post benching if it were a full season worth of stats.


Car123
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Jackson113.2 said:

If 

If he was 4 inches taller he'd be MVP 

Hypothetical bull poo.

💩 

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredibly stupid to include the rush stats in with the passing stats, just separate them out and then project. Also let’s see yards per attempt. That passer rating is still bottom of the league. He’s not a good QB, people who still think he’ll be our franchise guy are blind 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, t96 said:

Incredibly stupid to include the rush stats in with the passing stats, 

Oh my god I didn’t realize that lmao 

If that’s the case then did they subtract yards lost from sacks (we know the answer to this)

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

Not sure I see the issue with only looking at the numbers after he became the starter again after his benching. He sat, learned etc. and now we want to see if something changed. Hence we will measure the new period post benching. This is common practice and used all the time. I understand you are bitter, but good grief man.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Technically it is 23 TDs to 11 INTs if you remove the rushing TDs and I think about 3500 yards which is still an improvement. 
Even the broadcasts during the 2015 season separated Cams rushing TDs to his throwing TDs. 

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NAS said:

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

Agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

When you are threatened to be fired it can either light a fire under you or you continue continuing as normal because you see nothing you did was wrong. 
Bryce seems to have responded to the benching as the former. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

Big time credit, but I still don’t think he’s the guy. Looking forward to see what happens next year if he can take the next step. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also, the fact we are comparing this one to the 10 preseason tells me we are in for another horrible year. 
    • Well, they're both in the same league (if you will). During preseason, Fitz went 3/3 & Sauls went 5/6, but of course Sauls was 4/4 last night (including one 50+). Both were Lou Groza Award finalists. I believe Fitz made two 55+ yarders last season, while Sauls led the nation with three. Fitz was 13/13 (💯) while Sauls was 21/24 (87.5). Fitz was a 3rd-Team AP All-American, while Sauls was a PFF All-American.  Career-wise, Fitz was 58/74 (78.4), while Sauls was 52/64 (81.3). I wish that I could see the attempts and knew the depth of yardage. I wish that we could compare practice kicks during their training camps, but we can't. Maybe someone with a PFF/CFF account can give that Basically it's just a matter of belief I guess. Seeing dude knock down four FGs and go perfect during a pressure-filled game for him is damned impressive if you ask me. I don't believe that Fitzgerald could do that.  That being said, I'd have to know more. I will say that it may be worth mentioning that we seem to like PFF this year and Sauls being a PFF All-American may be notable. Now that being said, the Panthers may not be even considering Sauls.
    • Ive said it 1000x times on here.  Our 2025 season will be dictated by the first 4 games.  poo the bed there and lose all confidence and momentum, we win 5 games maybe.  Go 2-2, 3-1 we got a look at 7/8 wins
×
×
  • Create New...