Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Something I saw in the 2020 Draft for Funsies


Recommended Posts

 

On 1/31/2025 at 10:15 PM, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

derrick brown is the only player from that draft still on the panthers 🤦‍♂️

 

It's very easy to figure out why this Panthers team has expansion level talent, look at the last 5 drafts

 

 

 

 

 

1880871224_Screenshot2025-02-028_02_06PM.thumb.png.3b5ef73307d66229ec8a3314228f8c39.png

 

 

4th round RB that some fraud coachs' wife had the idea to draft is the best player in the last 5 years......

Fitterererererr was herniay without the 1st round gold, failed just as bad in Free agency ( minus on luvu...)

 

I've been complaining for the past couple years that Panthers need to fire any or all scouts, cause the facts are they are the worse group in the league. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, when you draft poorly for multiple years it's hard to build anything. It even caught up to the Pats once Brady was gone and quality vets were no longer willing to sign at a discount to chase a ring. All those years of bad drafting got exposed pretty quickly.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

 

It's very easy to figure out why this Panthers team has expansion level talent, look at the last 5 drafts

 

 

 

 

 

1880871224_Screenshot2025-02-028_02_06PM.thumb.png.3b5ef73307d66229ec8a3314228f8c39.png

 

 

4th round RB that some fraud coachs' wife had the idea to draft is the best player in the last 5 years......

Fitterererererr was herniay without the 1st round gold, failed just as bad in Free agency ( minus on luvu...)

 

I've been complaining for the past couple years that Panthers need to fire any or all scouts, cause the facts are they are the worse group in the league. 

what if I told you we fired the guy responsible but then hired his best friend right hand man?  Would you believe it?

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

what if I told you we fired the guy responsible but then hired his best friend right hand man?  Would you believe it?

Just because Morgan was his "right hand man" doesn't mean he's destined to be a bad GM. 

1) Morgan is a former NFL player who excelled in the league. He has an understanding of a locker room and team chemistry that Scott F could never have.

2) The final decisions rests with the GM, not the assistant GM. JD Vance may be out VP, but I think most of us realize that the D. Trump going to have the final say on what happens in the executive branch.

3) Scott and Matt seemed obsessed with the RAS/physical attributes of their draftees. Several times they passed over players who could have helped us immediately to draft someone with a physical upside. Sometimes you just need to draft the guy you need or take the best player on the board. the very fact that Morgan said he wanted to draft some "DAWGS" shows that his approach to the draft is going to be different from Fitz. I think Scott wanted to show off how smart he was by trying to make "shrewd deals" to move up and down the draft board. Morgan would have never moved down twice from the 30's in 2021 when we needed O-lineman to #58 to draft Terrace Marshall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Just because Morgan was his "right hand man" doesn't mean he's destined to be a bad GM. 

1) Morgan is a former NFL player who excelled in the league. He has an understanding of a locker room and team chemistry that Scott F could never have.

2) The final decisions rests with the GM, not the assistant GM. JD Vance may be out VP, but I think most of us realize that the D. Trump going to have the final say on what happens in the executive branch.

3) Scott and Matt seemed obsessed with the RAS/physical attributes of their draftees. Several times they passed over players who could have helped us immediately to draft someone with a physical upside. Sometimes you just need to draft the guy you need or take the best player on the board. the very fact that Morgan said he wanted to draft some "DAWGS" shows that his approach to the draft is going to be different from Fitz. I think Scott wanted to show off how smart he was by trying to make "shrewd deals" to move up and down the draft board. Morgan would have never moved down twice from the 30's in 2021 when we needed O-lineman to #58 to draft Terrace Marshall.

Morgan is a bad GM and there were people calling it before he proved it. Also he and Frittz worked hand in hand, friends at work and away. Even with the final responsibilities falling on Fritz as the GM, Morgan's work as an AGM was enough to pass on his promotion.

The guy traded into the first 1 spot for a WR that wasn't worth a 2nd and then took a RB who will be in year 3 while still hoping to show meaningful playing time. The team also needs to purge free agents he was point on brining in at both positions here the last 2 years.

Morgan is a suport guy, not a mastermind. He simply lacks the ability to be a top self GM. It was always obvious but fans get caught up in his player history and gave him way too much slack for the quality of work he did since he left Buffalo. Just like with Frittz, people here called it what it looked like when they were hired and then they proved it. Hell, Morgan is still obsessed with Dawgs lol. Now they have to restructure last years big, overpaid free agent signings just to field a team in 2025. Morgan isn't the same as Fritz in every way but they both suck regardless of any positives they could scrape together.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morgan may indeed turn out to be a bad GM. But, I'm not gonna bail on him after one season.

The 2024 Panthers were much better than the 2023 edition. It was Morgan who hired Canales, a clear improvement over out previous coaches. This team played hard down the stretch and nearly beat 3 playoff teams (KC, TB, Philly) in 3 consecutive weeks...and  2 of those are in the SB this year. We improved our win total despite having one of the least talented rosters from top to bottom in the NFL.

The draft wasn't great (I didn't like the J. Brooks pick either), but we acquired 3 players who should be better in 2025 (Legette, Wallace, and Sanders). We are arguably a center away from having a top 15...if not top 10 O-line in the league. A solid defensive draft in 2025 could put this team into playoff contention for the remainder of the decade.

I'm not gauging his 2024 season by the draft alone. I'm looking at win total, our ability to compete week in and week out, FA acquisitions, UDFA's, and our potential to improve in 2025 (we have 10 draft picks, including a 2nd rounder that we lost under Scott F.) 

Morgan could turn out to be a trash GM, but it's too early to write him off. I think the 2025 draft will be critical in assessing his tenure as GM.

Edited by SCO96
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Morgan may indeed turn out to be a bad GM. But, I'm not gonna bail on him after one season.

The 2024 Panthers were much better than the 2023 edition. It was Morgan who hired Canales, a clear improvement over out previous coaches. This team played hard down the stretch and nearly beat 3 playoff teams (KC, TB, Philly) in 3 consecutive weeks...and  2 of those are in the SB this year. We improved our win total despite having one of the least talented rosters from top to bottom in the NFL.

The draft wasn't great (I didn't like the J. Brooks pick either), but we acquired 3 players who should be better in 2025 (Legette, Wallace, and Sanders). We are arguably a center away from having a top 15...if not top 10 O-line in the league. A solid defensive draft in 2025 could put this team into playoff contention for the remainder of the decade.

I'm not gauging his 2024 season by the draft alone. I'm looking at win total, our ability to compete week in and week out, FA acquisitions, UDFA's, and our potential to improve in 2025 (we have 10 draft picks, including a 2nd rounder that we lost under Scott F.) 

Morgan could turn out to be a trash GM, but it's too early to write him off. I think the 2025 draft will be critical in assessing his tenure as GM.

I guess its relative to what you consider "much better" 

 

5 wins

Offense slightly improved

Defense fell off the cliff

 

Nobody is writing morgan off, we are simply looking at his previous and past body of work and it isnt giving anyone the warm and fuzzies.  Sure he could turn things around with a good draft but we havent had a good draft in charlotte in years.  Drafting has never been a strong suit for whatever reason for this franchise

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SCO96 said:

Just because Morgan was his "right hand man" doesn't mean he's destined to be a bad GM. 

1) Morgan is a former NFL player who excelled in the league. He has an understanding of a locker room and team chemistry that Scott F could never have.

2) The final decisions rests with the GM, not the assistant GM. JD Vance may be out VP, but I think most of us realize that the D. Trump going to have the final say on what happens in the executive branch.

3) Scott and Matt seemed obsessed with the RAS/physical attributes of their draftees. Several times they passed over players who could have helped us immediately to draft someone with a physical upside. Sometimes you just need to draft the guy you need or take the best player on the board. the very fact that Morgan said he wanted to draft some "DAWGS" shows that his approach to the draft is going to be different from Fitz. I think Scott wanted to show off how smart he was by trying to make "shrewd deals" to move up and down the draft board. Morgan would have never moved down twice from the 30's in 2021 when we needed O-lineman to #58 to draft Terrace Marshall.

Dan has his "Dawgs."

Fitts had his "RAS"

Rhule was "OOU."

Nippleshorts had his "Hog Mollies"

Marty has his "Gut"

I don't care what we call it anymore. How about we just draft some players that can actually play in the NFL. Can they pass the NFL minimum basic skills for their position before we draft them? I feel like half the players that we take wouldn't have even been a consideration if we had just looked at basic skills like footwork, catching, and tackling. 

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Drafting has never been a strong suit for whatever reason for this franchise

On this you and I are in complete agreement.

I don't know if:

1) we have bad scouts that mislead the front office, or

2) a bad front office that ignores good scouting.

3) a bad front office and bad scouting.

I don't think any of us would be offended if Tepper decided to hire an entirely new team of scouts going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SCO96 said:

On this you and I are in complete agreement.

I don't know if:

1) we have bad scouts that mislead the front office, or

2) a bad front office that ignores good scouting.

3) a bad front office and bad scouting.

I don't think any of us would be offended if Tepper decided to hire an entirely new team of scouts going forward.

Probably 3 at this point but overall we tend to try and get too cute with the draft and we simply dont draft football players.  Trading up for Brooks was just so unnecessary and thats a prime example of why our roster is bare.  Thats 4 fuging draft picks that were completely blown with no production.  That hurts

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

On this you and I are in complete agreement.

I don't know if:

1) we have bad scouts that mislead the front office, or

2) a bad front office that ignores good scouting.

3) a bad front office and bad scouting.

I don't think any of us would be offended if Tepper decided to hire an entirely new team of scouts going forward.

I think we've gotten too cute. We're sure we can develop guys faster than we can, and without much proof that we ever could to begin with. Instead of going for the solid players that can contribute right away in the early rounds, we swing for the fences and too often miss. Then we're left relying on guys taken in the later rounds when it's ok to find those home run guys since they shouldn't make up the majority of your team, unless you're the Panthers. 

I hate to say it's not that hard because it obviously is. But it seems like this MB gets it right as often if not more than our GMs when it comes to the success/failure rate of players we draft/like. Certain positions are found in certain rounds with pretty regular frequency. Fitts was horrible at following or even recognizing those trends and found himself on the tail end of a run instead of starting it. It's hard enough finding quality players. Take the ones you can get where you know they're usually found, spend smart in FA on the harder to find positions and the elite FAs when you're only 1 or 2 players away, and take your home run swings on the guys that fall a round below where you have them on the board. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...