Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everyone Pushing to Draft Yet Another WR Early


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It's not a yes or no question for him, as neither just saying yes or just saying no would be a correct statement.  The correct statement is that it's one of his weaknesses, as he has 3 "weaknesses" to his game, his top end speed, his initial get off at the snap, and his ability to separate on routes.

HOWEVER...........

Saying those are his weaknesses doesn't mean he's bad at any of them, he just isn't elite in those categories compared to the rest of his game, hence why they're "weaknesses" for him.  But again, as I've pointed out many times, not many WRs of his size/style of game are elite in those areas, if they were, they would be the next Calvin Johnson or Randy Moss, and if you don't want a tall WR just because they're not Calvin/Moss, then you expect too much.

He already runs a full NFL route tree at a high level, so once he crisps up some of his cuts (and more it's the post-cut separation than the cut itself) a bit as he gets better, that separation will become even better as well.  It's hard to fix a bad route runner once they're already in the NFL, but getting a great route runner to be quicker into/out of his cuts is pretty standard in the NFL. 

I don't think he'll struggle to get enough separation in this league to be a high end #1 WR, but if you expect him to have a Jefferson or Chase ability to quickly separate, you're going to be disappointed by him in that aspect of his game.

But as I've also said before, everything is a trade off, as maybe he isn't elite in those areas, but his hands, catch radius, and contested catch ability are all off the charts and I think are all better than guys like Jefferson/Chase.  For a QB like Bryce, who doesn't have the huge arm to fully take advantage of a take the top off type of speed WR, his ability to place the ball where he wants would be a perfect combination with T-Mac's catch radius and hands.

T-Mac is a faster but slightly less thick Mike Evans, my comp for T-Mac has always been AJ Green.  I think he will be a better version of Mike Evans (note, I'm not saying he's a surefire HOFer like Evans will be, but as great as Evans is, he's only had 1 or 2 seasons where he truly was a Top 5 WR in the league, his HOF status is more about long term consistency, like Frank Gore).

I'll put it this way, if he had elite speed/quickness/separation, there wouldn't even be a discussion of drafting him as there would be zero chance he'd fall to us, he legit would be in the mix for the #1 pick if that were the case as he'd be a perfect prospect.

If he never improves his speed and separation, I think he ends up in that 15ish best WR in the league every year, but still a true outside #1, to me that's his floor.  If he improves on them, as I think he will, then he has legit Top 5 WR potential and what I expect him to become in this league.

Better than Mike Evans hey your pinning all your credibility on TMac now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2025 at 3:34 PM, TD alt said:

Best player available. If that's a WR, then it is what it is.

A third year in a row taking a wr who has trouble creating separation? PFF has the best player available for us as the LT from LSU; should we take him?  How about the TE, RB or a QB? The worst defense in the NFL needs some help.  We can get a quality dt, edge, or cb at 8 and could even trade back for some more picks. A team this bad should not have a problem drafting for both quality and need since we need practically everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

Better than Mike Evans hey your pinning all your credibility on TMac now 

I'm fine with that, because I genuinely think he will be better than Evans.

AGAIN........

I'm not saying he will have a better career, that comes down to factors you can't predict like health and the team around him for team success.  But I fully expect, if healthy, prime T-Mac will be better than prime Evans.

Evans won't be a HOFer because of how good he was at his peak, but because of how long he was able to play at a high level, he'll get into the HOF because of the consecutive 1k yard seasons.  But he only has 4 seasons in his career of over 1,157 yards and only 6 over 1,051 yards.  If his 5 seasons between 1,001 and 1,051 yards all came up 50 yards less, and thus had 5 less 1,000 seasons, he might ever get into the HOF.

If anything, it's Evans as a red zone threat that has made him a HOF more than his yardage with his 105 TDs, and that's where T-Mac will be even better than Evans because he's more athletic and thus has an even wider catch radius than Evans.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm fine with that, because I genuinely think he will be better than Evans.

AGAIN........

I'm not saying he will have a better career, that comes down to factors you can't predict like health and the team around him for team success.  But I fully expect, if healthy, prime T-Mac will be better than prime Evans.

Evans won't be a HOFer because of how good he was at his peak, but because of how long he was able to play at a high level, he'll get into the HOF because of the consecutive 1k yard seasons.  But he only has 4 seasons in his career of over 1,157 yards and only 6 over 1,051 yards.  If his 5 seasons between 1,001 and 1,051 yards all came up 50 yards less, and thus had 5 less 1,000 seasons, he might ever get into the HOF.

If anything, it's Evans as a red zone threat that has made him a HOF more than his yardage with his 105 TDs, and that's where T-Mac will be even better than Evans because he's more athletic and thus has an even wider catch radius than Evans.

 

You can spin it any way you want Evans is one of the best WRs in the last decade 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

You can spin it any way you want Evans is one of the best WRs in the last decade 

If you look at individual seasons, he's only had a couple where he could have been considered a Top 5, maybe even Top 10 WR, and that's no knock on him.  You have an 11 year career where you have a couple seasons as a Top 5 WR and the rest as a Top 15ish guy, that's a hell of a career and puts you in the HOF, but I can probably easily name at least a dozen WRs over the last decade that I'd take over Evans if talking about a one game/season type of thing.

I'm comparing T-Mac to Evans as a player in a vacuum, where I think he'll be better.  But I'm not saying he'll have the better legacy/career because Evans was more of a very consistent very good WR than really ever a truly elite one.

Case and point, he's a sure fire HOFer, who also has only been a 2nd team all pro twice.  Which means the football writers only saw him and a Top 6 WR twice in his career.  

It's why I pointed out how it would be like comparing an RB to Frank Gore and being able to say they might be a better player, but not necessarily have a HOF career like him because that part is too dependent on other factors like health and longevity, which you can't predict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

You can spin it any way you want Evans is one of the best WRs in the last decade 

 

Just now, tukafan21 said:

If you look at individual seasons, he's only had a couple where he could have been considered a Top 5, maybe even Top 10 WR, and that's no knock on him.  You have an 11 year career where you have a couple seasons as a Top 5 WR and the rest as a Top 15ish guy, that's a hell of a career and puts you in the HOF, but I can probably easily name at least a dozen WRs over the last decade that I'd take over Evans if talking about a one game/season type of thing.

I'm comparing T-Mac to Evans as a player in a vacuum, where I think he'll be better.  But I'm not saying he'll have the better legacy/career because Evans was more of a very consistent very good WR than really ever a truly elite one.

Case and point, he's a sure fire HOFer, who also has only been a 2nd team all pro twice.  Which means the football writers only saw him and a Top 6 WR twice in his career.  

It's why I pointed out how it would be like comparing an RB to Frank Gore and being able to say they might be a better player, but not necessarily have a HOF career like him because that part is too dependent on other factors like health and longevity, which you can't predict.

Figured I'd take a shot at what I said here too, in no particular order other than when the pop into my head, all these guys I'd say were better than Evans, even if they don't get into the HOF like him....

Jefferson, Chase, Kupp, Tyreek, Hopkins, Diggs, Lamb, Adams, Julio, Antonio Brown, AJ Brown, Amon Ra, are all guys that I'd 100% take over Evans.  

Then there are a bunch of guys that if we're talking about 1 season or game, I'd be torn on Evans vs others, such as Cooper, DK, Waddle, Puka, Keenan Allen, Michael Thomas, Odell, Hilton and I'm sure there are some others I might not be thinking of in that last decade time frame.

But if I just said, "he's going to be better than Mike Evans" and leave it at that, you know everyone would call me crazy for predicting him to be a HOFer already, I view them as two different things.

Like I said, Evans is a HOFer who was mostly a Top 12-15 type of guy for most of his career, I think T-Mac will spend plenty of years as a unanimous Top 10 guy and be in the Top 5 discussion.  Will he have 10+ year sustained success and team success needed to make the HOF like Evans will, is impossible to predict and I wouldn't try to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

 

Figured I'd take a shot at what I said here too, in no particular order other than when the pop into my head, all these guys I'd say were better than Evans, even if they don't get into the HOF like him....

Jefferson, Chase, Kupp, Tyreek, Hopkins, Diggs, Lamb, Adams, Julio, Antonio Brown, AJ Brown, Amon Ra, are all guys that I'd 100% take over Evans.  

Then there are a bunch of guys that if we're talking about 1 season or game, I'd be torn on Evans vs others, such as Cooper, DK, Waddle, Puka, Keenan Allen, Michael Thomas, Odell, Hilton and I'm sure there are some others I might not be thinking of in that last decade time frame.

But if I just said, "he's going to be better than Mike Evans" and leave it at that, you know everyone would call me crazy for predicting him to be a HOFer already, I view them as two different things.

Like I said, Evans is a HOFer who was mostly a Top 12-15 type of guy for most of his career, I think T-Mac will spend plenty of years as a unanimous Top 10 guy and be in the Top 5 discussion.  Will he have 10+ year sustained success and team success needed to make the HOF like Evans will, is impossible to predict and I wouldn't try to.

You and I differ here I'd take Prime Evans over all your bottom tier and half the top 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aussie Tank said:

You and I differ here I'd take Prime Evans over all your bottom tier and half the top 

I'd be very curious who you'd be taking prime Evans over in that first list, especially if you're going their best 1 season, as Evans has never had a multi year dominant streak.  All those guys in that first list have seasons that have easily been better than Evans' best season.

For the 2nd list, I'm not saying I'd take them all over Evans, but none of them I'd take Evans without thinking about it, I think if you're talking peak one season type of thing, they all are comparable to Evans from the last decade.

I know it's not the end all be all, but prime Evans has never even been a 1st team all pro.  The 3rd most yards he's had in a season was 1,255 in a 17 game season.  He only has 2 seasons where he had over 79 catches and never broke 100.  And he's only had 11 missed games in his 11 year career too, not like his stats were held back due to missing a lot of games.

Evans is a great WR, a sure fire HOFer, but even at his peak, he only had a couple seasons of being a Top 10 guy in a given year.

His TD numbers are truly elite, I'll give you that, he's 9th all time, but being an elite red zone target doesn't on it's own make you better than other WRs.  But if that's why you view Evans so highly, then T-Mac with his better catch radius than Evans should be even more attractive as he really is going to be one of the best red zone targets in the league from day 1.  His catch radius and hands are going to be deadly in the end zone for whoever drafts him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'd be very curious who you'd be taking prime Evans over in that first list, especially if you're going their best 1 season, as Evans has never had a multi year dominant streak.  All those guys in that first list have seasons that have easily been better than Evans' best season.

For the 2nd list, I'm not saying I'd take them all over Evans, but none of them I'd take Evans without thinking about it, I think if you're talking peak one season type of thing, they all are comparable to Evans from the last decade.

I know it's not the end all be all, but prime Evans has never even been a 1st team all pro.  The 3rd most yards he's had in a season was 1,255 in a 17 game season.  He only has 2 seasons where he had over 79 catches and never broke 100.  And he's only had 11 missed games in his 11 year career too, not like his stats were held back due to missing a lot of games.

Evans is a great WR, a sure fire HOFer, but even at his peak, he only had a couple seasons of being a Top 10 guy in a given year.

His TD numbers are truly elite, I'll give you that, he's 9th all time, but being an elite red zone target doesn't on it's own make you better than other WRs.  But if that's why you view Evans so highly, then T-Mac with his better catch radius than Evans should be even more attractive as he really is going to be one of the best red zone targets in the league from day 1.  His catch radius and hands are going to be deadly in the end zone for whoever drafts him.

I don't get the peak one season argument. Consistency and availability is massive part of the equation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I don't get the peak one season argument. Consistency and availability is massive part of the equation 

Because this all stemmed from projecting the type of player a draft prospect could become.  It's impossible to project a career/legacy, too many unknown factors

You said Mike Evans was one of the best WRs of the last decade.  I was saying he only is because of the entirety of his career, not because he was ever actually one of the best WRs in the league at any given time.  Mike Evans is not going to be a HOFer because he was an elite WR, it's going to be because he was a very good one for a long time, the same way Gore will be in the HOF.

All those players from the last decade were guys who had peak seasons of being a better player than Evans, but whether health, the QB/team, something else, or still just too young in their career, they couldn't sustain it long enough to have the same career as him, but at one time or another, they were better than Evans.

I'm saying T-Mac is going to be an elite WR, his peak will be better than Evans best season(s), just like those guys I listed.  But I'm not predicting he'll be a HOFer because that's just nonsense to predict of almost any prospect in the NFL.  You need to be a Wemby type of prospect to really be worthy of actually being expected to be a HOF player before you even get drafted.

And it's no knock on Evans or his career.  There is nothing wrong with not ever being one of the best WRs at any time, but being so good for so long that you still get into the HOF.  Combine that with a ring and it's a career that anyone would take coming out from college, even if they aspire to have a better peak.

 

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, PappyMay said:

I want the first 2 picks to be defense, but I'm all for a receiver in the 3rd or 4th. Just think it needs to be a route runner who is quick rather than big body guy. Really hope our picks from last year take a step forward and 1 more year of AT being safety valve.

This right here. I would love someone like Ricky white out of unlv in the third or 4th. Tet isn't the kind of receiver we need. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Martin said:

So are you saying he has no problem getting separation? I’ve never seen him play, so I’m genuinely curious to understand if he can or not on a consistent basis. I’m not interested in if he can overcome it or not. Just looking for a yes or no on this question.

Chiming in to mention that I specifically asked that question because it stuck out to me how he didn't seem to separate well against collegiate level players nor did he seem to really bully guys with his size.

His game reminds me a lot of a more refined Devin Funchess. He's a shockingly smooth athlete while being a large target for the QB, but T-Mac definitely has much better hands and football instincts than Fun Fun (who was more of an athlete that played football as opposed to a football player imo). However, he doesn't explode out of his routes (tho, to be fair, he can run the whole tree) and relies on size + length to be one of those, "if he's covered, he's open" type of weapons.

While I'm not thrilled at the idea of taking him at #8, it is interesting to think about how he'd pair with Bryce considering that both Bryce and T-Mac's strengths are in how they're able to navigate chaos when a play breaks down. Fifita had a 3+ second release time at Arizona last season despite it being a first read offense... just imagine what T-Mac could do with somebody like Bryce instead... 👀

I guess it's fair to say that while I asked, T-Mac's lack of separation concerns me but I'm not worried? 😛

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...