Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tetairoa McMillan


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Conner Rogers has him at 55. Those are some huge swings.

It's hard to get a sense of how these guys stack up with such a wide range of rankings.  I'm beginning to think they are just mocking these guys rather than coming up with a true overall rank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Walker is not a tweener. He is a versatile LB who can rush the passer from multiple positions and also play the run and cover.  He is a better version of Luvu and Evero has already shown that he knows how to use a player like that.

And he is a solid dude, a team leader.  His quickness is outstanding and I suspect if he runs a mid 4.4 we probably would have to move up to get him, which I am not comfortable doing.  Id do somersaults if he is there at 8

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Walker is a beast. An absolute beast and Ive always thought once he tests at the combine he is going to shoot up the board and probably will not make it to 8.   He may be my favorite prospect in this draft

He’s my favorite followed by Mike Green for the 8th pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I saw it this morning on GMFB. I do not remember which draft "experts" list it was but the rankings. 

It is really hard to gauge Walker because he is not nailed to one position, so your comparisons are very limited--that probably explains the range of opinions on him.  I think he wears 11 for a reason, and that is to make people compare him to Parsons.  The Combine will be huge for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You gotta trust your evaluation. I could def see T-Mac being the highest rated WR in the draft, and available at 8. If you think he's Mike Evans, you have to take him. If you think he's just an above average NFL player, I think you have to go defense. That said, if he's there at 8, I could see somebody knocking on our door trying to get him. I don't want to trade out of 8, but I do see a scenario where it could be our best option if all the defensive players we value that highly are gone. 

This is why the scouts make the big bucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

 

I agree with both these takes.. walker doesn't have the production nor the solidified position to be talked about as a blue chip prospect in this draft. He's a very good player.. but elite? Why? Where?

Yeah, I'm a Georgia alum, and I don't see Walker as elite...not yet, anyway. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Verge said:

I don't think you need him to fill a box. You probably slap him at linebacker and ask him to rush on passing downs or slip him as a spy, or drop him off into coverage off the line. I see him more as an edge guy but I don't think he is limited to that. 

As a guy who was a defensive coordinator at Walker's high school years ago, (coincidence and not related to my point), I look at the fact that some teams will try to keep your run defense on the field and transition a back and TE to WR roles without subbing and forcing you to keep your run D on the field to defend them.  However, if we had a Strongside Edge who could move inside to a 3, 4i, or 5 technique, Parsons could then slide in beside him as an edge.  In other words, the way I am seeing it without giving it a ton of thought, it would give you a dominant pass rush on passing downs.  If you did that, your NT would stay put, which is why Evero likes smaller NTs that can pressure the passer.  Then Brown, for example, could slide out to a 3, 4i, or 5 technique and your rush edge (only in this situation) could rush--giving you 5 DL/Edge getting after the QB from any number of alignments, with the option to drop Walker or the rush edge into coverage.  Then the MLB, Nickel, and maybe a S could blitz because a RB and TE in this formation can be covered with a lone S or even the LB in some cases.  Whew.  I have seen offenses running the hurry up doing this more and more, and the large edge-holding Edge and a hybrid ILB could be the answer.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

It is really hard to gauge Walker because he is not nailed to one position, so your comparisons are very limited--that probably explains the range of opinions on him.  I think he wears 11 for a reason, and that is to make people compare him to Parsons.  The Combine will be huge for him.

Zierlien compares him to Nolan Smith.

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...