Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Edge Mike Green - Addressing Sexual Assault Allegations in Interviews/UVA Dismissal


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Plus he did transfer. Still need much more information. I want the police reports and statements by the women. 

Plus Im sure if this happened in college, his high school would have similar stories. Plus just like with Watson, tucker, other scumbags.....they do not stop at 2, there will be other stories. Where's the proof??, otherwise unknown rumors.  

Eh....don't forget likely HOF inductee, Ben Roethlisberger. He had more than one sexual assault allegation as a pro.

Different times, no doubt but still.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

I'd add Grant to that list he might be the better Michigan DT when the dust settles 

Yeah, I have a feeling Grant is the dark horse of the bunch to have the best career. I wouldn’t be mad if we picked him at 8. Don’t care if he’s “mocked” in 15-20 range. He would fill a need at nose which would impact the rest of defense. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, pdub0702 said:

Yeah, I have a feeling Grant is the dark horse of the bunch to have the best career. I wouldn’t be mad if we picked him at 8. Don’t care if he’s “mocked” in 15-20 range. He would fill a need at nose which would impact the rest of defense. 

I have seen more than one mock with Grant being drafted ahead of Graham.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Eh....don't forget likely HOF inductee, Ben Roethlisberger. He had more than one sexual assault allegation as a pro.

Different times, no doubt but still.

 

That guy was pure scum. I've call him rapeisburger on here plenty. It's down right disappointing know what many monsters have gotten away with, just cause they had fame or money. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

That guy was pure scum. I've call him rapeisburger on here plenty. It's down right disappointing know what many monsters have gotten away with, just cause they had fame or money. 

I mean Ray Lewis literally murdered a guy. Marvin Harrison did too. 

Crazy the difference in coverage.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean Ray Lewis literally murdered a guy. Marvin Harrison did too. 

Crazy the difference in coverage.

 everyone thought Marvin was some normal person, he was a real gangster and that's being nice.

so many others-

 https://www.investigationdiscovery.com/crimefeed/murder/5-disgraced-football-players-accused-of-killing-people

 

Aaron Hernandez

Leonard Little

ugh...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pdub0702 said:

Yeah, I have a feeling Grant is the dark horse of the bunch to have the best career. I wouldn’t be mad if we picked him at 8. Don’t care if he’s “mocked” in 15-20 range. He would fill a need at nose which would impact the rest of defense. 

Yep - His size and athleticism is simply rare. And is a guy at that spot with legit pass rush chops, not some run-d only clog.  He could easily rise.  I could see us being a team who has a soft spot for him. And that Nolen is a stud too. Lesser an NT but he’s fun as hell.

Murphy was the only IDL last year with refined PR chops. This year’s draft is a different story. Really love the interior talent.

Heck, you’ve got Norman-Lott and others in the next tier who is no slouch.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean Ray Lewis literally murdered a guy. Marvin Harrison did too. 

Crazy the difference in coverage.

Lewis was there and wouldn't tell the cops who did it so they charged him. He didn't murder anyone.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...