Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears Following Panther / Saints blueprint


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Chicago Bears are trading for Los Angeles Rams offensive lineman Jonah Jackson in exchange for a 2025 sixth-round pick, NFL Network Insiders Ian Rapoport and Mike Garafolo reported. ESPN first reported the news.

Bears to acquire All-Pro guard Joe Thuney from Chiefs in trade for their 2026 fourth round pick.  Thuney, a 32-year old stud G, is in the last year of his contract and saves the Chiefs about $16m. 

Sound familiar?

Making this Panther related:  The Panthers have 3 solid OGs and it has paid off, so it seems. The Panthers have 2 OTs, Ickey and a 31 year old solid player with knee concerns. The Panthers have Cade Mays at C and I am not sure if they have a backup at this time, or if they want to make Cade Mays the backup.  People with these young QBs are starting to get it. OL first.  Grabbing a first overall pick QB (you're welcome, Chicago) without an OL is like buying a Corvette when all the roads around you are dirt or gravel.

It seems that the Panthers will address depth at OT and possibly draft their 2026 starter now, in the event Moton becomes Motoff at some point.  A worn and torn knee on a 10-year vet 300 lb OT is not something you go "all in" on.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know he was from SC. It sounds like he's just being polite. And I'm sure he also sees similarities between himself and Canales too. But investing in the OL intelligently certainly isn't something new.

As far as the Bears go however there is no love whatsoever. I wish them only pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Oh sure, teams around the league look at us as the model franchise to emulate.

Cracking Up Lol GIF by Rodney Dangerfield

OK.  The people who know football and the cap must manage that money to get the biggest bang for the buck.  The Saints started investing in Guards when Brees was the QB.  It worked.  The Panthers just saved a QB who was a near-certain bust by adding Guards.  Nothing else was new. It was a good example, and football execs pay attention--yes, the Panthers won 5 games.  But down the stretch, they were 4-5 with two close losses to both Super bowl teams.  But I assure you, GMs will not worry about a team's reputation or some inferiority complex inherent in its fan base.  They saw a rather amazing turnaround and they are in the same situation with their rookie QB. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Bears HC Ben Johnson praises Panthers as blueprint for OL construction

https://sports.yahoo.com/article/bears-hc-ben-johnson-praises-195530190.html
 

this was about a week or two ago. 

Some are saying, "build to OL is not new information." That is not the issue.  The issue is how much can you invest in G without under funding other positions.  The cap makes it tricky.   Spending on Guards is not widely-practiced; it is a trend--  In the past, the LT, C, and RTs got the coin.  Guards were not prioritized (you have to drop $$ at some positions to pay other positions).  So the concept of building an OL as a key to success is not new, but the commitment to certain positions over others is tricky.  

KC showed the world how their OL troubles backfired, and they just traded away a 4-time All Pro OG.  ???? Salary cap.  They have some big salaries elsewhere.  So they are going to try to find studs in the draft--I am guessing KC would love to sign Banks (Texas).  I think they would trade up to get him.  Maybe to #8.

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, frankw said:

I didn't know he was from SC. It sounds like he's just being polite. And I'm sure he also sees similarities between himself and Canales too. But investing in the OL intelligently certainly isn't something new.

As far as the Bears go however there is no love whatsoever. I wish them only pain.

I did not know that either--I knew UNC.   Williams and the Bears are in the same situation Bryce and the Panthers were in a year earlier.  Bryce turned it around.  Surely he paid attention to what Carolina did.  I don't see that as being polite (unless I missed your meaning); I see that as being smart.  How many times have we heard, "It is a copycat league?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I did not know that either--I knew UNC.   Williams and the Bears are in the same situation Bryce and the Panthers were in a year earlier.  Bryce turned it around.  Surely he paid attention to what Carolina did.  I don't see that as being polite (unless I missed your meaning); I see that as being smart.  How many times have we heard, "It is a copycat league?"

He's a first time head coach complimenting a peer that has been in the basement for a long time now. That's really all I take from it.

Look I'm a Panthers and Hornets fan through and through and will remain that as long as the teams reside here but let's be realistic. No one is legitimately trying to copy anything with this franchise currently. Hopefully that can be subject to change down the road. We'll have to see.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Some are saying, "build to OL is not new information." That is not the issue.  The issue is how much can you invest in G without under funding other positions.  The cap makes it tricky.   Spending on Guards is not widely-practiced; it is a trend--  In the past, the LT, C, and RTs got the coin.  Guards were not prioritized (you have to drop $$ at some positions to pay other positions).  So the concept of building an OL as a key to success is not new, but the commitment to certain positions over others is tricky.  

KC showed the world how their OL troubles backfired, and they just traded away a 4-time All Pro OG.  ???? Salary cap.  They have some big salaries elsewhere.  So they are going to try to find studs in the draft--I am guessing KC would love to sign Banks (Texas).  I think they would trade up to get him.  Maybe to #8.

The cap is going up massively for the second strait year, and is likely to keep moving up close to that amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, frankw said:

 No one is legitimately trying to copy anything with this franchise currently. Hopefully that can be subject to change down the road. We'll have to see.

The coach of the Chicago Bears just referenced the turnaround of the Panthers once they invested in guards.  He then has just signed 2 high profile guards.  How is that not copying the Panthers?  I agree that there is not a lot to copy here, but step back.  We lost Darnold before investing in the OL.  We lost Baker before investing in the OL.  We drafted Bryce before successfully investing in the OL.  We invest in 2 guards.  After a slow start, Bryce ends the season 4-5 and is very close to both Philly and New England.  Later, the new coach of the Bears references the Panthers and how they turned it around after signing high profile guards.  A week or two later, they announce they signed 2 high profile guards.  I think all GMs paid attention to what has happened here.  It may not be the sole basis for their decision, but the defense cost us 2024, not the offense.  In addition, we did it without our #1 WR, a top TE, and the cupboards were pretty bare at WR.  I think they noticed.  As you say, Frank, we shall see.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...