Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Prospect Visits/Meetings (Final Update-4/22)


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Miami’s Restrepo didn’t run at combine and posted a 4.8 at his pro day.  That’s a brutal time at a pro day where everything works in your favor 

I think the rams wr did the same thing. His gametaoe remind me of him and definitely a guy you catch sliding in the draft in rd 4 or 5 and end up outplayed the slot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CRA said:

Miami’s Restrepo didn’t run at combine and posted a 4.8 at his pro day.  That’s a brutal time at a pro day where everything works in your favor 

Oof. I pulled him in a mock in like 4-5 round and felt good about it.  That might be his ceiling now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

I think its either Graham, Walker, or Williams for us

Edit: if we stay at 8

I mean, we have had no contact with Graham nor does anyone seem to be linking him to us in recent weeks.

I think he is about as unlikely as Tet.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, CRA said:

Miami’s Restrepo didn’t run at combine and posted a 4.8 at his pro day.  That’s a brutal time at a pro day where everything works in your favor 

I would still take him in the draft. He has a knack for getting open. That is worth a Day 3 pick.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2025 at 7:35 PM, kungfoodude said:

If you look at some of the 2024 pics of Graham, he really does look VERY soft. Nothing there looks like PEDS. Maybe too much Detroit Style pizza.

Screenshot_20250323_193400.thumb.jpg.f142f6f8155e622361511ef29d998392.jpg

Exactly. We like our players VERY hard. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Edited by scarface
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, we have had no contact with Graham nor does anyone seem to be linking him to us in recent weeks.

I think he is about as unlikely as Tet.

Graham is the first person on the list of visits you posted  to start this thread.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, csx said:

Graham is the first person on the list of visits you posted  to start this thread.

It isn't my list. It is one of the mods.

Looks like we talked with him at the combine.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I would still take him in the draft. He has a knack for getting open. That is worth a Day 3 pick.

Right. Day 3 only though. Obviously he's more quick than fast.

I ran a 4.6 in high school, and I didn't even run track or train for it. Granted that's probably closer to a laser timed 4.8. I was the slowest runner in my high school backfield - they were all track sprinters though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...