Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Any interest in Kyle Juszczyk?


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Aussie Tank said:

They lost Deebo and still cut him there has to be a reason 

Money and age.  He is 33 and was due a pretty big chunk. They netted something like $4 mil savings on the cap.

His play has not dropped off at all but admittedly, he probably is shopping for a contender rather than another paycheck.

2 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Could find multiple way to use him. I think he'd be a great addition. 

I agree. I don't think he fits with our current youth movement, however. Love the player, though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

We are currently constructed on offense as a ram it down your throat rushing team. He would also add an element of being a reliable safety valve for the QB.

What say you, Huddle? Get one of the last true FB's in the NFL?

I’d love it. We can’t use our QB in those 3rd/4th and 1 goal situations. Chuba might go for 2k with a legit lead blocker and this line. Plus like you said dude can catch and pass block. I think Bryce should be running bootlegs and some waggles and such anyways. 
His experience would be asset I think. Hopefully we see some good smart moves today

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

Lol at best receiver at TE, or RB....

He catches dump offs and the occasional wheel, or depth completion off misdirection.

Age 33, no real YAC potential...I'm good.

They could use Tremble more in some of that role then. Fb/h back is highly underrated imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, the style of game that Bryce plays, I could see Kyle being a huge benefit. Having a true H-Back that can stay in and block, catch, and run at times? At this point, I'm all for going more physical on offense, as I was under Wilks and in hoping we would retain him. 

I think getting Kyle, drafting Skattebo and Tyler Warren, and picking up a shifty receiver to learn under and around Adam, would be all this offense is missing.

I'd also like Mekhi Becton. I don't want him to start. I just want him as an extra tight end in goal line situations with Tyler Warren and Cam Skattebo lined up in the backfield to take either the tush push or to do a sort of wild cat play. You could also have Kyle back there because he can both block and catch. 

That would be a nearly unstoppable force within 5 yards of the goal line, every time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...