Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else really concerned about Hoover being gone?


bigjohn

Recommended Posts

Now this really hurts me to say as an App State guy (and also because I saw Hoover light up my team in high school for about 250 yards), but does anyone think our running game is going to take some time to get over Hoover being gone?

I think Hoover might finally get the credit he deserves when our running game suffers a bit. Granted, our O-line and backs are complete studs, but I think Hoov was a big part of that combination.

How's Fiametta looked in camp? I was there last year and he's a physical speciman.... I just hope it translates into performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now this really hurts me to say as an App State guy (and also because I saw Hoover light up my team in high school for about 250 yards), but does anyone think our running game is going to take some time to get over Hoover being gone?

I think Hoover might finally get the credit he deserves when our running game suffers a bit. Granted, our O-line and backs are complete studs, but I think Hoov was a big part of that combination.

How's Fiametta looked in camp? I was there last year and he's a physical speciman.... I just hope it translates into performance.

No. Not at all. Hoover was a great panther. It was time for an upgrade by going younger. 10 years from now lets hope we ask the same thing about Fiametta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may have been a good move I guess....mainly injury-wise. He has certainly taken a pounding over the years.

Oh, and while I'm at it:

Don't fire Fox.

Don't change to a 3-4 defense.

It's too hot to wear all black.

I still have a Delhomme jersey, so bring him back. I'm too cheap to buy a Moore jersey.

Peppers should have gone to the NBA instead.

There. Now I don't have to start 5 more threads tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fiametta may play better with the experience from last year added with the fact that he will "own" the FB role, and be expected to perform as a starter, and not with the beloved Hoov over his shoulder, waiting for the next snap.

I hope to see him blowing up holes for Double Trouble all season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think we would spend that kind of money on a LB that can’t play all 3 downs. It said he played 331 coverage snaps last year and only gave up one TD so him not being a coverage LB seems kinda like BS?
    • Moton should be back in 27 just due to the guarantees. I can't see us cutting him and eating that cap hit. Trade might be a bit different, but how many teams trade for 20m tackles?  I wouldn't be surprised to see us take 2 this year, 1 in the first and one in the 4th that has potential to play inside if they don't develop as quickly. Our line is awfully thin atm with the unknown injury Hunt got during the postseason. Even if Hunt's ok, we still lack depth. I could see is walking away from this draft with 2 tackles and a center, especially if we move down to pick up an extra 3rd or 4th. 
    • He was so up and down for 4 seasons. They declined his 5 year option for a reason  Oloukon has been their LB1.  Evero loves to send pressure so my guess is if Lloyd is going to be used a 3 down back here he’ll be blitzing on 3rd down a lot. Would’ve liked to have signed someone a lot quicker if that’s the case. Lloyd isn’t very explosive. Used to be
×
×
  • Create New...