Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After Day three.... New draft strategy?


Recommended Posts

I have been playing with a few mock drafts today.  Four times in a row on two different platforms I had Travis Hunter fall to me.  After today's free agent haul, I would pound the table for him.  Legitimately could fill two voids at the highest of levels AND give us more positional flexibility.  I think his usage would be so unique and frequent that he could not be a "starter" but play the same in not more snaps than most starters.  Hunter played 1,443 snaps last season.  If he gets 30 snaps per game on each side that's a starter's level snap count.

  • 3rd / back up starting CB, 1/3 time nickel back
  • #3 WR that could be a #1 depending on the game plan or injuries.
  • Dan could figure this out.  I can now see the vision.  

Think about the draft board ahead of us:

  • Titans - nope, it's Carter or Ward
  • Browns - not really, I see QB or Carter
  • Giants - maybe, but I think it's trade or QB.  Sanders feels like the best option.
  • New England - Maybe, but OT or Mason seems like the Vrabel move to me.  But after sitting under the BB tree maybe he could see it in a similar fashion.
  • Jacksonville - Maybe, but they need OT/OG/CB too.  Would Coen have the stones to make his 1st draft pick such an unconventional one?
  • Las Vegas - It just feels like Jeanty is the pick here.
  • NYJ - you know full well Aaron Glenn is going defense here. 

I could see it!

 

Edited by BeenPounding
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're drafting as high as 8 you get the most sure fire player almost regardless of position IMO that falls to you. 

I don't care if that's Tet McMillain, Tyler Warren, Jaylon Walker, Mason Graham, etc. Only positions I wouldn't draft is QB and RB at 8. 

You're over thinking this stuff about Travis Hunter. I don't think he drops to 8. Of course he'd be a steal at 8, but you also have to hope he doesn't end up being a Chinn/Simmons where he's a jack of multiple positions but a master of none. Also worry about him staying healthy with that thin frame and insane snap count. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, coffee said:

Absolutey!  Drafting for needs is the equivalent of prevent defense.

I would argue the Legette, Mingo, DJ Johnson picks were drafting for need vs BPA .

I really think Morgan and Canales fumbled hard in their first draft. Could've had something like McConkey and Fiske vs Legette and Brooks which is criminal. 

Draft last year was mid with legette ,JT Sanders,  Wallace, and CS Wade being decent but nothing great thus far anyway. The Brooks injury really pulled this draft down from maybe a B to a C . Now we're banking on Legette making an exponential leap coming off foot surgery in year 2 to make this class redeemable. 

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s all a huge wildcard now. Titans seem primed to take Ward but then it’s anyone’s guess.

Cleveland’s starter is Kenny Pickett which is a problem…and they just paid Garrett. There’s not a ton of Hunter smoke and Shedeur is not going this high. Do they just take Carter? Trade down? They’re in a quagmire.

I see 4 likely off the board: Ward, Carter, 1OL, & Hunter 

But then..Jeanty? McMillan? (Both have Raiders smoke), OL2, Johnson, Sanders, Graham, Walker, Warren?

I think we’re still looking at a top guy, I’m leaning Johnson or Walker. Just hope we don’t turn and say, “it doesn’t matter just get that edge rusher we want (Pearce/Stewart/Mykel/etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

I'm still going Tyler Warren in the first, Xavier Watts in the second.

If Warren has already been selected, Jalon Walker come oooon dooown.

I want Warren too, but signing Tremble solidifies that that's not an option for us. Tremble is pretty much TE2, and you don't pay a TE3 16 mil. They think Sanders and Tremble is enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

I want Warren too, but signing Tremble solidifies that that's not an option for us. Tremble is pretty much TE2, and you don't pay a TE3 16 mil. They think Sanders and Tremble is enough. 

Tremble is on a 2-year deal and Sanders' blocking is awful.

Warren is still in the cards. :3

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get it, but it's just like "dropping dimes" doesn't have a definition either but is saying the same thing. They're like what the Supreme Court said about Porn, "you know it when you see it" And I think you have to be watching with some crazy ridiculous Bryce goggles to think he was "slinging dots downfield" as the OP said.  I'm not taking anything away from Bryce for making the necessary throw in those situations and got two TDs on two 4th down plays.   But they weren't "sligning dots downfield" and they weren't "dropping dimes", they were pretty basic throws for any NFL QB, not even starting QB, just any QB.  They were 15-20 yard touch throws for the WR to run under it, with no safety over the top of them or need to let them get down in bounds.  They were in essence practice throws with no DB covering them, just in a high pressure game situation. 100% perfect throws for what was needed, which in itself is a credit to Bryce as he's struggled with that on easy throws in the past.  And hell, this literally might have been his best game of his career all things considered. But "slinging dots downfield" is just an absurd statement to say after today, sorry.
    • Idk, but I was just scrolling shorts and this video popped up calling the Tmac pass an “absolute dot” so, unless this is you, it seems like it might meet more people’s definition of “dot” than he thinks. Anybody crashing out over calling these passes “dots” really can’t be taken seriously on any Bryce Young related topic because he clearly affects their ability to think straight.    
×
×
  • Create New...