Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox: Too Early to Name QB for Next Week


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

lol, wow this team has no direction...

http://twitter.com/mikecranston1

mikecranston1

Fox says right now "it's too early" to say who will start at QB next week. "We have a lot of work to do" on offense 17 minutes ago via TweetDeck

Fox on the turnovers: "They're all deflating" 21 minutes ago via TweetDeck

mikecranston1

#Panthers coach John Fox: "We had a little bit of a spark for about 3 1/2 minutes. ... In this league that's not enough" 20 minutes ago via TweetDeck

edit: week

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's official: I want Fox gone.

It's not even that Clausen played that well - he was average at best - or that he was better than Moore by a ton - it's the stability issue.

You can't bounce around QBs like that, not when you're dealing with young players. The team needs to know who their leader is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox shouldn't have benched Moore that early. Not with a concussion mixed into his 7 quarters. Wasn't a legit shot. Was more like a bad game.

He made the move now he has to let Jimmy get reps and grow. Jeez, how is this guy still coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just to clarify: I'm not arguing that height or footwork can’t affect QB play. I'm asking how those concerns translate into measurable, consistent outcomes. That’s the standard we should be applying to all QBs, not just Bryce. If height is such a limitation, then we'd expect to see elevated batted passes or poor pressure evasion. Yet none of that shows up in the data. Bryce was one of the lowest in the league for batted passes and his 16.9 pressure-to-sack ratio is good enough for 9th out of all QBs with 300+ dropbacks. So if you believe footwork tied to height is a meaningful issue, what metric shows that because two that would aren't doing so? This isn't about denying flaws. It's about applying fair, consistent standards because otherwise we’re not evaluating performance which means that it's not analysis taking place... it's just going off of the vibes that somebody has consciously decided on. Citing one red zone play you remember doesn't provide that consistent standard. I don't say that to dismiss your memory, but to emphasize that anecdotal evidence (especially from an avowed skeptic) shouldn’t carry more weight than consistent tape or analytics. For example, there was recently dissonance over Bryce's deep ball accuracy where it was implied that he was inaccurate throwing 20+ yards. Yet, the data and film show otherwise. And I unfortunately have to still ask since you won't directly answer: What specific metrics do you believe matter when evaluating whether a QB is top-10? You've mentioned YPA and passing yards per game, and that's fair. If that's what you're prioritizing, then let's call that your criteria but clarity matters because it prevents moving goalposts when the data doesn’t match one's expectations. I appreciate the response and hope that your holiday weekend goes well also. ❤️
    • Me too. I got other things I can do. Tie it up 2-2 and I will be back, but Im tired of watching us get swept.
    • Svechnikov and I'm voting cause I'm pissed. 
×
×
  • Create New...