Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derek Landri the real deal?


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

Well, stats can be a little misleading in that Landri has spent allot more time on the field than most of the other defensive tackles in the league in between our absurd number of 3 and outs on offense - but he has played well and the other white meat (Nick Hayden) had a pretty good game against Da Bears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the bigger problems have been the play of our defensive ends not named Charles Johnson. Our tackles have been solid if unspectacular, but our ends can't keep contain on running plays or get pressure on the quarterback on passing downs. There really isn't a big need to run up the middle if you can get yards just as easily on the outside.

People always praise the tackle stat for linebackers, but it's really a flawed measure. If your second level of coverage is getting the majority of your tackles, then you're probably getting gashed in the short passing game and rushing game.

In regards to Landri, yes he does look like the real deal as far as I am concerned. He does a decent job of holding the line together and has made a number of big stops for losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look around the league man. A LB almost ALWAYS leads a team in tackles. That's not a reason for concern. Concern comes when a DB is leading your team in tackles.

I agree about our DEs, but I think some of their lack of production comes from the lack of a DT that commands a double team. When we traded Jenkins (not that I think that was a bad move), we lost that DT. There is no one on our DL that keeps an opposing OC up at night. That's the big difference with this year's DL. With Peppers, we had that guy that kept OC's up at night in a cold sweat. With Peppers and Jenkins, we had two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to be starting Hardy. He's scary for opposing OC's and I think he's our future. Why NOT get him experience in a throw away year?

I think he's been seeing more snaps he's just dominating like we all want him to. He'll be great eventually though. E. Brown is scaring me though I'm afraid he might be a bust. I'll give him another year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to be starting Hardy. He's scary for opposing OC's and I think he's our future. Why NOT get him experience in a throw away year?

I agree with giving Hardy the start, but I don't think he's scaring anyone yet. He's a promising young prospect, but he hasn't reached the scary level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For comparison purposes we are not leading the league in number of defensive plays surrrendered but we are third at 344. Washington leads the list at 362. By comparison the 20th ranked team is at 295. So the general average seems around 300 or 60 plays a game. The lowest ones like Tampa have already had their bye. So in comparison we are right at 69 plays a game.

In rushing attempts we are second at 35 attempts a game, the average is around 27.

So does Landri benefit from more plays? To some extent sure, his 20 tackles is 4th in the list for tackles. But interestingly the next highest Panther D linemen is Johnson tied for 29th on the list at 15 tackles. I don't remember when the last tine a DT lead our line in tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since our interior DL is kinda suspect and we should probably spend our 1st round pick on a DT, why not go with the Giants' way of 3 DE's and one DT. Play Johnson, Brayton, Brown/Hardy and Landri? Speed, pash rush and Brayton is big enough to stop the run on the inside. Plus Beason can slide down in the box and come off the edge to add more pass rush ability on passing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...