Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculation from Twitter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You mentioned tight end visits. I mentioned one that just came through. 

Had nothing to do with Warren.

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Cam Jordan was on Good Morning Football.  A player like Cam (lifelong Saint and a great ambassador for any team--I like him a lot) could be used by the Saints to create a smokescreen.  He denied that the Saints would take a QB in the first round, claiming that it has not been done since Manning in 1971 (paraphrasing)... It seems to me, (conspiracy theory forthcoming) that bit of information would have to have been researched/premeditated/planned.  Was he attempting to scoff at the concept that the Saints would draft a QB at #10?  Remember, Carr missed 7 games last year and had a 63.something QB rating.  He was not believed to be returning in 2025.  When the Saints thought that one of the top 2 Qbs were not going to be there at #10, they did not take advantage of the void clause in his contract, the way I understand it.  That means they continued to kick the Carr contract down the road.  In 2026, Carr's cap number is $69m--nearly a quarter of the cap for a 35-year old QB they do not want.  He is to be paid a $40m salary with a $10m roster bonus. While I am not a capologist, it is interesting if they really like Shedeur. All that matters is the perception that the Saints will take him at 10.

If the Giants pass on him, and I think they likely will, Sanders could draw interest from the Raiders (I do not see it) at 6 or the Jets at 7 (more likely, but still unlikely).  The Panthers are the most likely trade partner--unless the Jets want to move back.  So who may realistically trade up for a qb?  The Colts (14), but there is no noise about them taking a QB and I do not think they have shown interest--instead, a competition between Richardson and Jones is the plan.  The Steelers (21) are in play, and the Rams are in play.  There is, however, another option for Carolina as a trade partner--The Saints.  A draft day switch for a third rounder might keep the Panthers targeting their player at 8 and add a pick in the process, suggesting they do not want to move back--but I get the impression that the Panthers are looking to move back.

 

That's a double win.  Picking up an extra 3rd and sticking them with Sanders.

If we had an extra 3rd, I would not be so stressed about getting an edge in the first.  Get Warren, then pick up an edge, wr, and s in rounds 2-3.  Depth t, cb, dt, and lb in rounds 4-5 and we're ready to roll.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

I can't even begin to imagine what you have going on in your life that makes you such a miserable little prick on a daily basis. It most certainly isn't Panthers' football, but I hope it gets better for you.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

He wasn't arguing against your point. Simmer down.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Christ dude you are losing it.  I was responding the the poster that said he wanted warren, I said we havent brought him in yet but have brought in other tight ends, therefor its highly unlikely we are drafting warren.  Thats pretty linear and not that hard to follow

I lost it once a while back, but found it again about half an hour later.

As to Warren, don't know but I wouldn't rule anyone out based on visits. Plenty of teams (us included) draft players they might not have hosted.

Beyond that though, again it was just because you mentioned TEs. Wasn't making an argument on any particular point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, grimesgoat said:

That's a double win.  Picking up an extra 3rd and sticking them with Sanders.

If we had an extra 3rd, I would not be so stressed about getting an edge in the first.  Get Warren, then pick up an edge, wr, and s in rounds 2-3.  Depth t, cb, dt, and lb in rounds 4-5 and we're ready to roll.

and if I wanted Sanders (Saints) and "heard" that the Steelers and Panthers were chattering about a trade, I would consider trading up w/ Carolina.  It would be smart.  Carolina could be reluctant to trade back to 21 because Walker is on the board, for example, so Carolina would not lose out on their first-round target and add a third in a draft that has talent in the third (DT, for example).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe a bit of a homer take but I can't give us a grade lower than A.   Freeling was arguably the best LT prospect in the draft.  His athletic ability is off the chart and at 6'7" that can move.  It was a no brainer pick.   Hunter's key word is Violence. Putting him next to Brown should scare an offensive coordinator. These two give Scourton and Phillips plenty of chances to get one on one opportunities. Brazzell, another tall receiver with sprinter speed.  Our WR room is filled with tall talented WR.  Brazzell is going to give us a WR that can take to roof off the defense.  Basically Jimmy Horn with size. W. Lee III has a nickname of the Blanket. (heard this on the Beleav podcast with J. Stewart)  What a great name.  A great value in the 5th round. Hecht A strong, fast and extremely smart center. Many had him listed as the best center in the draft.  He's most likely a starter sooner than later. Wheatley A good safety in round 5.  Someone who could see playing time.   Kuwatch  I love this pick.  At minimum he will be a key piece on special teams and with some good coaching he'll see some packages where he'll play.  His down piece is he doesn't stay up in the running game.  Good coaching will fix this.  He reminds me a bit of A.J. Klein.   All these picks were great value.  I believe everyone of them were graded higher than the pick we took them.   Dan Morgan is IMO doing a great job turning this team into a good team with great depth.
    • Moton is a class act.  
    • Sure, that is possible. That’s what, an extra 55 yards a game on average and 7 more TDs? What if he’s just 15th?  I imagine they would extend him in that situation due to the belief that he’ll keep trending up. maybe a 3 year contract to prove he can be top 10? Sounds like a Tepper plan.
×
×
  • Create New...