Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we get Luck, Bring Jake back..


Fade2BlackAndBlue

Recommended Posts

So, he's such a good QB that he can mentor people now?

The best players aren't always the best coaches (and vice versa).

Jake could absolutely teach a young guy a lot. I have no doubt he's helped Colt McCoy prepare.

With all that said, I'm not in favor of the idea. I like Delhomme as much as anyone (why wouldn't you? he's a great guy) but realistically, I just don't see it.

Jake might make a pretty good broadcaster. He was always good on camera.

Oh yeah, you didn't see the awesome job he did with McCoy?

We're in no position to crack on McCoy :nonod:

His passer rating for the season to date is 93.0. Clausen's is 59.1.

Throw in that he's got two wins as a starter. Clausen just got his first yesterday, and it was against the Cardinals. McCoy's first win was the Saints. Heck, all but one of the losses he started were close games. Yes, the offensive style is different, but still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i dont believe luck is the answer to our problems

How dare you question the healing powers of the almighty Luck? He who cures all football ails, who can will an opponent's 3 and out from the bench, who can throw 60 yards downfield and catch it hinself all while blocking a 350 lb DT.

Quick, someone ban this heretic before his lies spread to the masses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and I am surprised so many people are in disagreement with this.

When we cut Jake, we still had to pay him his huge salary, and after we cut him we were left with Matt Moore and Hunter Cantwell. The Panthers didn't feel like Cantwell would amount to anything and cut him. Going into the draft the Panthers realized they needed a quarterback and Jimmy Clausen fell to them in the second round, so they drafted him. Then the Panthers shocked the world when they traded into the third and selected WR/QB/KR Armanti Edwards who has appeared in only two games this year. They selected Edwards with players like Mike Williams, Tony Moeaki, Navorro Bowman, and Trevard Lindley still on the board. Then as the NFL Draft progressed we hit the 6th round. Now keep in mind the Panthers have already drafted two players that can play quarterback (although one was drafted to play wide receiver), with that said the Panthers decided to take quarterback Tony Pike. The Panthers took Tony Pike when players like Cody Grimm, Dekoda Watson, J'Marcus Webb, and Jamar Chaney were still on the board. After the draft and the preseason games Hunter Cantwell was let go and our quarterback rotation looked like this...

1. Matt Moore

2. Jimmy Clausen

3. Tony Pike

4. Armanti Edwards (Emergency Use)

Through out the season, injuries and poor performances occurred which led to the signings of quarterback Keith Null and quarterback Brian St. Pierre. One quarterback has not played for the Panthers and probably never will and the other failed to perform in his only game.

Now we look at Jake Delhomme, Jake has always been a guy of character and class. One would think that Jake would have taken on the responsibility and mentored Jimmy Clausen and Matt Moore through all of their struggles this year. Now the outcome may not have been different but at any time we could have said, ok Jake lets see if you have changed back into your old SUPER BOWL self. Instead we let him go, we had to pay out his contract and we lost to his Browns team and in turn also have a worse record than the Browns. Re-signing Jake Delhomme to mentor Clausen and possibly Luck would not waste a roster spot. Drafting Tony Pike and Armanti Edwards, then signing Brian St. Pierre and Keith Null waste's roster spots.

I would not have a problem bringing Delhomme back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...