Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I kinda hate getting our pick spoiled but at least the Huddle has more Time to debate


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Also I'm pretty sure the Panthers are in the majority of teams that have Loveland higher on their board. 

 

I've said from the start that if Walker is there he's the pick.

Still on that train of thought and have gotten nothing that would change that way of thinking. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

our biggest need is still developing and answering the QB question. 

True. But this idea that we need to go balls out dedicate all resources to offense to figure that out is just wrong. And I'm pretty sure the team feels the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

Bryce is going to have to learn to run Canales offense or be shown the door. 

That's dumb though.   It just means you have a HC that won't/can't adjust to win.  That's dinosaur behavior. 

and it also means, you should of just moved on from Bryce Young last year and this whole thing is just going to be a waste of time.   Bryce Young just flat out doesn't fit that mold of QB play.  

I personally don't think Canales is that bad and stubborn.  I think going into last season he basically conceded they would move on from Bryce.  But now?  Well, now he has a job to do.   Best plan of action is to continue down the path of him being a QB guru.....not an old head stuck to football has to be played one way. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

That's dumb though.   It just means you have a HC that won't/can't adjust to win.  That's dinosaur behavior. 

and it also means, you should of just moved on from Bryce Young last year and this whole thing is just going to be a waste of time.   Bryce Young just flat out doesn't fit that mold of QB play.  

I personally don't think Canales is that bad and stubborn.  I think going into last season he basically conceded they would move on from Bryce.  But now?  Well, now he has a job to do.   Best plan of action is to continue down the path of him being a QB guru.....not an old head stuck to football has to be played one way. 

Did you see who they signed to start at TE??? Tremble was signed to start at TE. Lol 

 

He doesn't value the TE and he expects his QB's to be able to throw to the numbers. Which is what Bryce is going to be expected to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

True. But this idea that we need to go balls out dedicate all resources to offense to figure that out is just wrong. And I'm pretty sure the team feels the same way. 

well, it's not balls out.....to address the fact all we got over the middle of the field is slow AT.  

I'm sure the old slow guy that was about to retire after last year and missed 7 games....is a poor bet to make going forward.    Cupboard is pretty bare in terms of guys who fit the bill of getting the ball out quick to.  

I don't like Bryce.  But I have said since the day we drafted him....you got to get him receiving talent otu of the backfield and slot/TE play.  Otherwise, what's the real point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Did you see who they signed to start at TE??? Tremble was signed to start at TE. Lol 

 

He doesn't value the TE and he expects his QB's to be able to throw to the numbers. Which is what Bryce is going to be expected to do. 

All TEs on the roster aren't supposed to lean toward recieving weapons.  I got no issue with Tremble.  But he is what he is.   Tremble is there to aid w/ the run game. 

Panthers spent a trillion dollars all things considered on Bryce Young.  Last year they got a surprise from him.  Worst thing they can do is stick with square peg/round hole mindset that Bryce has to fit something no one would ever have argued he would/should be in. 

So I'm sticking w/ my same position.  You got to greatly improve at two spots at Bryce is your QB.  Middle of the field and out of the backfield.  The short pass game.  If you weren't interested in that.....then you should of never of drafted Bryce Young let alone given up the farm for him.  And majority of the people at BOA signed up for the Bryce Young project.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Byrdman4real said:

This

He is the only sure thing that could be available at 8 and could be BPA.

It's a no brainer

Most mocks have Warren going to the Colts at #14.  Where someone is drafted and where they are ranked on a Big Board can be, and often are, not the same. Here is Klatt's opinion on this with the Colts pick.  Something I was saying to another poster earlier this morning and then I just ran across this video a short time ago.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CRA said:

if Bryce Young is going to be your QB......the O simply has to cater to what he does well and doesn't.

What Canales did in Tampa and Seattle isn't Bryce Young.   It was home run football downfield. 

During that last stretch Young was one of the best deep ball QBs in the NFL.  He was running DC's offense and it was looking great despite needing some more weapons.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Our offense devalues the TE, so why take one early when he isn't going to be used as a weapon? 

You are right on that, but offense schemes need to evolve with talent on field. I would like to see if Sanders can develop as well......I just think having a TE who can read defensive zone coverages for pockets AND can body 1 on 1 defenders is invaluable for an offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

During that last stretch Young was one of the best deep ball QBs in the NFL.  He was running DC's offense and it was looking great despite needing some more weapons.  

Bryce wasn't even cracking an average of 200 yards per game in regulation to close out the year.  We were 30th in passing yards on the season.  

He made great strides vs his rookie year.  Glaring change.  But that was glaring simply because of how historically bad his rookie year was.  We are still a bad passing offense.  2024 was a bad passing O.   

I'm not buying whatever stat twisting was done to come up w/ Bryce was one of the best deep passers in the league. 

I still think it's simple.  You want Bryce to succeed? You need pass catchers out of the backfield.   You need slot/TE play.  You need YAC.  You need him to be what you drafted him to be.  We were way below average in terms of production out of the backfield.  We were way below average in terms of YAC.   Dreaming up we can somehow make Bryce some chunk play passer downfield is not something worth bothering with. 

Trade him if you don't want build around the dude you mortgaged our future on.  Keep him and play to his strengths.  I don't care which one.  But pick.  I give them a pass going into last year of things conflicting.   Now you got to pick IMO. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Bryce needs much better slot/middle of the field and backfield receivers.  That's basically his game. 

I still say XL was picked back when 99% thought we were moving on from Bryce Young in short order.  XL fits what Canales did in Seattle and Tampa.   Still need that role in any offense but all the bread and butter Bryce throws need upgrades. 

Great point. This offense isn't fixed by any means and with the lack of proven weapons at the TE position we have I say keep firing. When a team has a legit TE threat it's changes the game. It just does.

Now is Sanders that guy idk I hope so! but it isn't Tremble sooooo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hope this is not common knowledge to you, lifeless internet whores, (perhaps a bit too strong) but I decided to look into this to see what data Morgan and company will be examining.  Morgan recently said that Ickey's surgery was successful, but that is far from an endorsement that his return to form will be. Mathematically, his return to form is a longshot, and if he cannot play at the level he was playing, we need a left tackle, regardless of the 9-12 month average recovery time. Career Outlook for Linemen   Recent medical data indicates that offensive linemen (OL) have a significantly higher risk for patellar tendon injuries compared to all other position groups. For linemen, the mechanical demands of the position—specifically the extreme eccentric overload required during pass-blocking and the stress of managing a higher body mass index (BMI)—contribute to both injury frequency and difficulty in recovery.  Return to Play (RTP) Rate: The overall RTP for PT ruptures is only ~55%, significantly lower than the ~79% average for other orthopedic surgeries.  In other words, a player with an ACL is 25% more likely to return to play.   Return to Form: Only 21.4% of players return to their pre-injury performance level within two years.  (We have a 1-5 chance that Ickey returns to his present form-forget about his positive development and potential before the injury.  I am not a fan of those odds, especially when it could take 2 years to get there.) Positional Impact: While skill players (WRs, RBs) rely on agility that the patella tendon (PT) anchors, linemen require the tendon for the "explosive" leg drive needed to anchor against 300+ lb defenders.  (In other words, it impacts agility and leg drive, and I can't think of many positions on the field that need those abilities more)   Injury Type  Return to Play (RTP) Rate Career Longevity Impact Patellar Tendon Rupture 50% – 57% Highest (Worst outcomes in games played/performance) Achilles Tendon Rupture ~76% High (Decline in power/efficiency ratings) ACL Repair (ACLR) ~79% Moderate (Significant 1st-year decline; better long-term recovery)   Recent High-Profile Cases (2025–2026) Ickey Ekwonu (Panthers LT): Suffered a rupture in January 2026; he is expected to miss the entire 2026 season due to the 6–12 month recovery timeline. Rashawn Slater (Chargers LT): Suffered a rupture in August 2025, forcing him to miss the 2025 season and potentially much of 2026. Trent Brown (Texans RT): Suffered a tear in late 2024 and returned to play in 2025, serving as a rare "hope" case for the position.  Data from the NFL and NIH (National Institute of Health) Overall Assessment We basically have a year to evaluate Ickey's progress, but we need to consider the likelihood that he will never return to form. What is Ickey's "Form?" Ickey had 7 penalties (about average for the position) and surrendered 5 sacks (bottom third).  So the lever he has a 21% chance of returning to is serviceable--not elite or above average.  There is a 78% chance that he does not return to this level or play.  I would add that he has been improving, but the data does not include projected form; it is based on current levels (2025) The Panther decision:   In the view of MHS, the Panthers should begin be re-signing Nijman and BC if possible. I imagine their agents are aware of the Ickey situation.  Nijman is 30ish and a strong run blocker, but his pass pro is weak (47.0 PFF vs run grade of 86.1-that is consistent with my novice observations).  He needs TE/RB help, in other words in some passing sets.   Christensen (29) would be my preference, however, because he has shown the capability to be an effective left tackle in the NFL, driven by elite agility, technically sound pass-blocking, and high-level college production (96.0 PFF grade in 2020). While sometimes limited by average arm length compared to prototypical tackles, his quick feet allow him to reach spots and maintain balance. He has successfully filled in at tackle for the Panthers and is considered a highly versatile, dependable lineman.  So if the Panthers can get these two back, they could find a LT later in the draft to develop.  The more I think about it, the more this might be my play. Even if the OT we draft late is not ready to play LT in 2027, we still need depth and youth at RT.  I would move Ekwonu to guard now and have him start learning that position (film, technique).  Lewis and Hunt will be leaving (unless restructured) in 2027-2028.  If Ekwonu takes 2 years to "return to form" as stated, he will show signs of his potential in 12 months--allowing Morgan and doctors to assess his likelihood to return.  Then I might offer a backloaded, unguaranteed contract with heavy incentives. We could draft a LT in the first round, but forcing a rookie to start at LT in the NFL has been far from a quick fix or recipe for success.  They often struggle for the first year--I am satisfied that, if we run the ball more as seems to be our MO, use more quick hitting passes such as slants, outs and some digs, we can function for a season with BC and Nijman.  Maybe this is a situation that is good on paper but catastrophic on the field, but free agency is not where you find your LT, and first round rookies tend to struggle. Furthermore, at the Senior Bowl (I think it was the Senior Bowl--East West maybe?) the panthers seemed interested in a tackle that is going to be a day 3 pick.  Of course, there are no first or second rounders playing in that game, so it could just be due dilligence.  
    • I dont disagree but saying that now feels like we are in bizarro world.  Can you imagine typing that back in August?
×
×
  • Create New...