Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guys that will either make or break our Young Quarterback!!


Doc LRB
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, jfra78 said:

I didnt read the article, but there are no excuses for Bryce.  He will make or break his self, stop blaming the rest of the team for his "short" comings.  Had to do it

 

Excited Lets Go GIF by BoDoggos

I wish it was different, but really, it's all in his own hands now. If he can come back and be that guy he was at the end of last season then we are looking at something long-term and grand.

If not... then it is back to the draft, again. Unless Canales has another reclamation project waiting in the wings.

Personally, I believe in what I saw. I think he can certainly do it. I want to see him succeed at the highest level possible.

Edited by Khyber53
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper and previous performance, this line is very strong.  Not perfect but it shouldn't be a concern for a QB.  There is a stronger case for concern related to his weapons than his protection but this offense is built for a QB to be successful and it is up to Bryce at this point.  

Cautiously optimistic based on the end of last season but time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

Maybe the offense doesn't have any excuses, but the defense has to give the team a chance. We can't be playing from 3 touchdowns behind and expect the offense to still thrive every game. We have to get some stops on 3rd down. We have to be able to create more time of possession for the offense more opportunities through turnovers. There's more pressure on Evero than there is on Bryce I think this year. Even if only slightly.

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Plus he can still have a great season with a bad defense.  It may not show up as wins but he should get plenty of drives to show how far along he has come in his development even with a bad defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Plus he can still have a great season with a bad defense.  It may not show up as wins but he should get plenty of drives to show how far along he has come in his development even with a bad defense.  

Really bad defenses actually present opportunity for offenses to overperform statistically.  

which IMO is a red flag/concern about last year.  We had a historically bad defense.....and really didn't generate much O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

Yeah and the defense was the worst in history, statistically. And then we invested heavily into defense this off-season. We had holes everywhere last year and weren't a good team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Yeah and the defense was the worst in history, statistically. And then we invested heavily into defense this off-season. We had holes everywhere last year and weren't a good team. 

I still contend if you give any org our OL last year......more offense should of resulted.   The D being THAT bad makes sense given what the DL was post Brown going down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

I still contend if you give any org our OL last year......more offense should of resulted.   The D being THAT bad makes sense given what the DL was post Brown going down. 

One player going down on either side of the ball (minus quarterback) should never reasonably result in complete collapse.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

One player going down on either side of the ball (minus quarterback) should never reasonably result in complete collapse.

I mean, it wasn't a "collapse" as much as it just made an already bad defense historically bad. Add any one player in NFL history to that D and it would've still sucked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

We had the 29th ranked O last year.   29th ranked offenses need defenses to flat out win games for them.   

and virtually ALL the investment went into that O while virtually intentionally letting the D slide.  

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rodeo said:

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

I don't mind no longer dumping massive resources into the position but striking a balance between the two approaches would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, rodeo said:

It has been really weird to watch this team go from Sam Mills to Thomas Davis to Dan Morgan to Jon Beason to Luke Kuchly to.... being content with Josey Jewell. Linebackers used to be our DNA and now are a complete afterthought and staying that way.

100% agree.  LB and then to a much lesser extent but still a thing was DL.   We at least know we largely where going to have the defensive front 7 intact year to year pending injury didn't derail it.   

I can handle moving away from being RB central but the D is a bit tough to see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he has another good season, we're probably not going to get out of it, as that's just the nature of the beast. The salary cap goes up and salaries go up.    Maybe we won't have to pay him that high, but it will most certainly be in the neighborhood. As his season goes, so will his salary (provided that the two sides won't come together now (if there's anything even going on). https://catcrave.com/panthers-insider-sets-steep-ikem-ekwonu-extension-price-despite-rocky-nfl-ride
    • I mean, I think you will really struggle to find many prognosticators that don't have us in the bottom 5. Part of it is that we do have a bottom 5 overall roster(still true) and part of it is that we have more question marks than most rosters. Finally, we have consistently been a bottom 10 team for close to a decade now. Nothing is really a safer offseason projection that putting us there.
    • Dean Jones, the resident writer for Cat Crave, thinks that we should consider signing Noah Fant. Jones titles his article:  Panthers quietly handed perfect fix for overlooked flaw at just the right time He calls the TE position an "overlooked flaw," and even though I wouldn't necessarily go as far as that, I do believe that the Panthers would instantly buttress the position with a Fant signing. The Panthers just may throw out feelers, and there are connections.   "Fant played for Panthers' tight ends coach Pat McPherson for two seasons. He was also in Seattle with head coach Dave Canales and offensive coordinator Brad Idzik in 2022. This also happens to be a position group that is dangerously short of dependable options."   I guess it comes down to whether or not the Panthers believe that our guys can be the real deal, or at least fill the need that Canales and company have for this offense. I have been skeptical of the lack of TE involvement in the regular flow of the offense since Canales has taken over, but it may be because of the lack of legit and/or experienced personnel. Fant hasn't been spectacular. He is an apt move-TE though. He is a so-so middle of the pack-ish pass blocker. His run blocking grades leave a lot to be desired (save for one year).  I guess that I could see it, but I just don't know if Fant moves the needle enough to spend the extra money on him. For a first rounder, he's been kind of a bust in my opinion. He's still NFL-worthy, and he's still in the prime of his career. But, I think I'm more in disagreement with Jones about thinking Fant is the "perfect fix." He just may be a more expensive, albeit more experienced, option than we already have.   https://catcrave.com/panthers-quietly-handed-perfect-fix-for-overlooked-flaw-just-right-time
×
×
  • Create New...