Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My hope for an ending to the musical chairs at kicker is waning


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

My belief is he just doesnt have the leg.  Yea, hes accurate, but a lot of kickers could be accurate if never asked to kick 50+ yard field goals.  Because of that, it meant we had to move on.  If Wright and Fitzgerald struggle, I'd actually be ok bringing Zane Gonzalez back.  Hes not on a roster and when he was healthy, he was a pretty reliable kicker for us.

He is very accurate on 50+ kicks(11/14 career) but the limit of his range is literally probably 53-54 yards. 

We often chose to avoid kicking because of that.

Gonzalez is not the answer either. Better off attempting new guys over and over in the hopes one will eventually pan out.

15 minutes ago, NAS said:

Not having a reliable kicker is often the difference between wins and losses. Definitely a growing concern

"Luckily" we have been a very bad team, so it hasn't reared it's head much. 

I mean, I hope we even have the opportunity to trash a kicker for missing a GW FG of consequence in the next few seasons. That would be strangely refreshing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I say run with the rookie and see what we got

Why fail with a journeyman who has never really made it?

Even if it's rocky with the rookie, there is more of a chance of him figuring it out than there is for a borderline kicker to suddenly become great.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

So, um, why did we let Eddie go?

I'm sorry, but somehow I just missed what was the actual reason.

There are a few reasons in my opinion.

He had a bad attitude.  Thought he was better than he was.  Probably expected a big payday because of that.  Had a weak leg that caused us to go for it in positions we wouldn't normally.  When his accuracy was technically best in the NFL, his head blew up.  A lot easier to be the most accurate when we are terrified to attempt anything past 50.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BlazeCarolina said:

There are a few reasons in my opinion.

He had a bad attitude.  Thought he was better than he was.  Probably expected a big payday because of that.  Had a weak leg that caused us to go for it in positions we wouldn't normally.  When his accuracy was technically best in the NFL, his head blew up.  A lot easier to be the most accurate when we are terrified to attempt anything past 50.

 

He only missed a couple from 50+. Truth is, we didn't get many chances to gamble those. Our offense was abysmal and the last thing you want to do is ask your kicker to attempt a 50+ yarder every offensive possession because it is just harder to do consistently. That's how you crush a kicker's confidence and break him if he starts routinely missing those. He was automatic up to 40, and very accurate up to 50. Eddy wasn't the best in the league but he definitely wasn't the worst. The only thing hurting him was his declining FG% year to year. If he has an up spike there in his last year, even just a bit, he's still here 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

He is very accurate on 50+ kicks(11/14 career) but the limit of his range is literally probably 53-54 yards. 

We often chose to avoid kicking because of that.

Gonzalez is not the answer either. Better off attempting new guys over and over in the hopes one will eventually pan out.

"Luckily" we have been a very bad team, so it hasn't reared it's head much. 

I mean, I hope we even have the opportunity to trash a kicker for missing a GW FG of consequence in the next few seasons. That would be strangely refreshing.

I agree, lemme rephrase, I'd be ok with Zane if Wright looks like trash and we for some reason decide to not go with the rookie.  The rookie is the answer IMO, just roll with him and give him a chance to grow, but if FOR WHATEVER reason, Zane imo is about the same as Wright and atleast showed some promise when he did kick for us a few years back (He was Special Teams player of the week and didnt have a noodle leg).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Eddy was fine tbh. Historically good. Unless he doesn't have it in him anymore, need to kick those tires maybe 

He was 22nd in FG % and 26th in XP%

The season prior he was 18th and 37th

 

Historically good at what?

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, csx said:

He was 22nd in FG % and 26th in XP%

The season prior he was 18th and 37th

 

Historically good at what?

You did stop before his near best in the NFL year.

He was significantly better than any kicker we have had since Gano. 

The biggest issues were leg strength and his declining performance over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BlazeCarolina said:

There are a few reasons in my opinion.

He had a bad attitude.  Thought he was better than he was.  Probably expected a big payday because of that.  Had a weak leg that caused us to go for it in positions we wouldn't normally.  When his accuracy was technically best in the NFL, his head blew up.  A lot easier to be the most accurate when we are terrified to attempt anything past 50.

In his defense, and really, all kickers... if you're regularly needing to kick 50+ yarders, then there's a problem with the offense.

But yeah, he was bottom third of the league level. 

Still, it's hard to find someone who can be top 2/3 of the league level.

Kickers, man, they'll kill ya.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You did stop before his near best in the NFL year.

He was significantly better than any kicker we have had since Gano. 

The biggest issues were leg strength and his declining performance over time.

The year before was like 6th or 8th on the season. The best ever was combining spot duty with the first half of 2022. Cherry picking at best. He's been nowhere near that since

You cant spin him in to a good kicker. He's unemployed 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...