Official Panthers roster cuts thread

[45catfan]

11 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

David Moore and Jimmy Horn Jr are expected to make the team. 

Are we planning on keeping 4 RBs?  We may only keep 9 O-linemen then with 3 TEs.

[carpanfan96]

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

7 WRs? Thats seems like a lot.  

because no way you keep those 2 and not Renfrow 

I'm pretty sure AT is being traded and the WR group would look like this. 

XL, Tmac, Coker, Renfrow, Moore, Horn Jr. 

If not then 

AT, XL, Tmac, Coker, Renfrow, Moore, Horn Jr. 

 

Tremayne is excepted to be placed on the PS right now. 

[carpanfan96]

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Are we planning on keeping 4 RBs?  We may only keep 9 O-linemen then with 3 TEs.

9 oline with 3 Te's is what I expect to see. 

Hubbard, Dowdle, Etienne for sure I think. Dunno if they keep Blackshear or use someone else for returns. It is possible they keep four rb with Blackshear just for ST, but I think they end up cutting him and going with youth at PR and KR. 

[therealmjl]

Trading AT is beyond stupid. The return is literal peanuts.

[Jon Snow]

The last spots on the depth chart always comes down to if the can play on special teams. If they are not good on special teams they do not want to be last on the depth chart because you will be replaced by someone who can. Just saying. 

[carpanfan96]

4 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Trading AT is beyond stupid. The return is literal peanuts.

I'm expecting a 5th and two 6's, with the 5th being conditional "could go up to a 4th" based on snap counts and yards. 

[XClown1986]

Just now, carpanfan96 said:

I'm expecting a 5th and two 6's, with the 5th being conditional "could go up to a 4th" based on snap counts and yards. 

Where are you getting this from?

[carpanfan96]

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

Where are you getting this from?

Some of it from multiple Vikings beat reporters, the Panthers WR room is from an Athletic report and another source.

[Mr. Scot]

23 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I'm expecting a 5th and two 6's, with the 5th being conditional "could go up to a 4th" based on snap counts and yards. 

If those involve us covering even a single penny of salary, they can kiss my ass.

[jb2288]

45 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I'm expecting a 5th and two 6's, with the 5th being conditional "could go up to a 4th" based on snap counts and yards. 

We have all the leverage, I really hope we don’t do this. Give me a third or no deal, it’s literally that simple. We want him here and don’t need to trade him, you gotta make it worth it for us. 

[45catfan]

59 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Trading AT is beyond stupid. The return is literal peanuts.

It is stupid trading AT, but I'm kinda curious to see how Bryce performs without his crutch.

[TheSpecialJuan]

31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If those involve us covering even a single penny of salary, they can kiss my ass.

  

May I? 

[carpanfan96]

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

If those involve us covering even a single penny of salary, they can kiss my ass.

That's what's taking so long and why it's on day 4. lol

[tukafan21]

3 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I'm expecting a 5th and two 6's, with the 5th being conditional "could go up to a 4th" based on snap counts and yards. 

Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass?

If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1.

Starter for a Starter

Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.