Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legette vs everyone else


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

That draft was so easy. Ladd fell into your lap at 33. Take him. DeJean fell to 39, take him.

No bullshiit trades. 

Could’ve easily been those two and Trey Benson. 

They try so hard to be the smartest ones in the room rather than taking the players that are more obviously going to be good. I think that is largely driven by who the owner is. They want to do it "their" way, but their way has been wrong a whole lot more than it has been right. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ImfromClayton said:

He’s impossible to defend at this point. Even though I still try to do so. 
 

the toolbox of little things that wide receivers do to get an extra step here, or an edge in leverage on certain routes, he does none of it. He’s a project at best at this point. 

He's 24, you kind of what you are at that age. I'm still amazed we moved up so we could get a fifth year option on a guy that might not even make the roster in year 3 lol. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

He's 24, you kind of what you are at that age. I'm still amazed we moved up so we could get a fifth year option on a guy that might not even make the roster in year 3 lol. 

He was a dumb pick.  But the blame on him is unfair given it’s only year 2.  We should wait until year 7 like Bryce or else we’re not really being fair right?

Somehow this guy needs to be removed from the NFL, but the jury is still out on Bryce.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was a dumb pick.  But the blame on him is unfair given it’s only year 2.

No, it’s not. He’s unprepared, unmotivated and unsuccessful at every facet of the game. The QB not being very good is not an excuse for a WR loafing it to the LOS and half-assing routes. It hasn’t stopped T-Mac from being an impact player. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So he’s like our QB then lol.

Kinda but not really. If you took Bryce’s 2023 game against the Colts, or his 2024 game against the Chargers, and translated that to a WR you’d have almost every Legette game. Young being bad is a separate issue; Legette being unplayable is its own. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was a dumb pick.  But the blame on him is unfair given it’s only year 2.  We should wait until year 7 like Bryce or else we’re not really being fair right?

Somehow this guy needs to be removed from the NFL, but the jury is still out on Bryce.

Yeah that's my issue. There can be two things true at one point. Bryce Young can be a bust. Xavier Legette can be a bust. But one is a first overall pick in his third year with 25+ starts of bad play the other is 2 games into his second season. But only one of them some people here are saying should be shipped off right now. They aren't being consistent.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Joe Bear said:

Kinda but not really. If you took Bryce’s 2023 game against the Colts, or his 2024 game against the Chargers, and translated that to a WR you’d have almost every Legette game. Young being bad is a separate issue; Legette being unplayable is its own. 

It’s not about XL being bad.  It’s about the double standards and mental gymnastics to make excuses for Bryce.

Yeah XL sucks.  Why is it so hard to apply the same standards to all the players?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

It’s not about XL being bad.  It’s about the double standards and mental gymnastics to make excuses for Bryce.

Yeah XL sucks.  Why is it so hard to apply the same standards to all the players?

This is an XL thread. You brought Bryce into it. There are 500 Bryce threads.

How can T-Mac make things happen whereas Legette is a net negative everywhere (literally)?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id say its hard to evaluate anyone on offense with Bryce at QB. Everyone takes a hit not only performance wise, but mentally as well. With that said, I wouldve never drafted him with just 1 good season out of 5 in college. As time passes, Dan Morgan is looking more and more like Fitt 2.0.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...