Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NextGen Passing Chart - Week 3


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

In 2 seconds how many can get deep? That how much time he had if you are paying attention.

I mean, sure it's a valid point, but you must remember that it's an average. Bryce Young had 2.46 seconds to pass on average. The average in general across the league is around 2.5 to 2.9 seconds, meaning that, sure, it was somewhat shorter, but you still take your shots when you can get them, and hopefully connect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

So the Panthers beat a division rival 30-0 and you guys are on here to show how bad Bryce Young is?! So you don't really want Carolina to win. You want them to win the way you think they should win. With who you want them to win with.

Do you have any idea how goofy this ish is? 

well we got a football next week and a whole bunch more after that....

how many QBs you think are going to gift us like Penix did going forward? I'd say not many.  Likely none.  So, yeah, reality of what we are still matters.   Unless Penix is going to take the field Sunday and lay an egg in New England our bad offense is still what we need to see get on track and show improvement. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

well we got a football next week and a whole bunch more after that....

how many QBs you think are going to gift us like Penix did going forward? I'd say not many.  Likely none.  So, yeah, reality of what we are still matters.   Unless Penix is going to take the field Sunday and lay an egg in New England our bad offense is still what we need to see get on track and show improvement. 

Last week, the QB finished strong. Ended up with 300+ yards and 3 TDs. That wasn't good enough because it was against a "soft zone" defense, and he "failed when it mattered". This week, he made the plays he needed to and allowed the defense to dominate without taking chances. Now he didn't pass for enough yards for you. Some of you can't see how you look for the negatives. I can find negatives for every player on every team in every game. Just mindboggling to me that you're a fan of a team you don't even want to see win - unless it's on your terms. Just enjoy the win. Geez.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Last week, the QB finished strong. Ended up with 300+ yards and 3 TDs. That wasn't good enough because it was against a "soft zone" defense, and he "failed when it mattered". This week, he made the plays he needed to and allowed the defense to dominate without taking chances. Now he didn't pass for enough yards for you. Some of you can't see how you look for the negatives. I can find negatives for every player on every team in every game. Just mindboggling to me that you're a fan of a team you don't even want to see win - unless it's on your terms. Just enjoy the win. Geez.

I mean, Bryce did dig us a massive hole last week before playing well against soft D and then folding like a lawn chair when they had to start playing stingy again out of need. And we did play a team that turned the ball over at will yesterday while failing to do much as cross their own 30 yard line all game long allowing us to win 30-0 while passing for 121 yards and 0 TDs with a 5 yards per attempt average.

I don't think we learned anything new about Bryce yesterday. Whatever you thought of him going into yesterday you probably still think.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Last week, the QB finished strong. Ended up with 300+ yards and 3 TDs. That wasn't good enough because it was against a "soft zone" defense, and he "failed when it mattered". This week, he made the plays he needed to and allowed the defense to dominate without taking chances. Now he didn't pass for enough yards for you. Some of you can't see how you look for the negatives. I can find negatives for every player on every team in every game. Just mindboggling to me that you're a fan of a team you don't even want to see win - unless it's on your terms. Just enjoy the win. Geez.

last week the QB finished horrifically when the gimme ball was taken off the table.  Couldn't move the ball 1 yard when it mattered. 

Bryce Young is a backup caliber QB.  The issue is the issue.  This game altered nothing in the Bryce convo.  It was a variant of last years AZ game only in this game the opposing QB was comically bad and they gifted us one. 

The people calling out the O and the issue in Carolina....are making the most easy and in your face call.  It's not even in the realm of controversial in reality.  Bryce Young is not what any team wants at the QB spot.   We don't need to keep this silliness up past this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TD alt said:

I mean, sure it's a valid point, but you must remember that it's an average. Bryce Young had 2.46 seconds to pass on average. The average in general across the league is around 2.5 to 2.9 seconds, meaning that, sure, it was somewhat shorter, but you still take your shots when you can get them, and hopefully connect. 

Of course. He missed some shots and threw over or behind some receivers. It wasn't a great performance and Atl brought real pressure. It was great to see the defense play so well that Bryce didn't have to be perfect to win. That is what makes football such a great team sport. One side can pick up the other. The defense bailed out the offense and special teams while special teams kept Atlanta in the hole most of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Most QBs so far this year have looked mid 

all though this is the norm for young, beating the falcons ass, just like last year, he deserves a little leeway, regardless if you think he’s long term answer or not 

Bryce vs the Falcons: 3-1
vs literally anyone else: 4-25
 

Get a real qb, make Bryce a backup like his skill set indicates, and trot him out twice a year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

I agree at the end of the day but yall pissing on a fire ant hill bringing it up after that ass whooping yesterday lol

And the defense should get all the credit. Offense did mostly nothing. 

it was a 10 point game until Penix handed off a ball to the DB for six in the third quarter. 

even if you think the game flow indicated the passes and playcalling, the panthers couldn’t move the ball at all. Their fg was in the second was from the 40. 

But I guess the offense did better than the jj McCarthey led Vikings. 

put that in the ring of honor. 

Edited by electro's horse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...