Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More positive signs (defense)


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

We didn't get Ransom to sit the bench but he is still learning his fits and responsibilities. He will see more field as he improves. What the defense finally did on Sunday was not have significant breakdowns with players out of place or blown coverages. As he figures that out he will ultimately become the starter because he is a dog and instinctively around the ball.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CanadianCat said:

I really like our rookie class this year.. 

Yeah. So far it looks like we have 4 hits. It is early. 
plus the kicker and this new kickoff plan. 
And we got some good out of the late pucks last year. Mike Jackson is basically our 7th, CSW and Coker salvage some good from it even if XL and Brooks bust. Wallace is possibly going to be better. 
8 or 9 starters out of two drafts is really good. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, strato said:

Yeah. So far it looks like we have 4 hits. It is early. 
plus the kicker and this new kickoff plan. 
And we got some good out of the late pucks last year. Mike Jackson is basically our 7th, CSW and Coker salvage some good from it even if XL and Brooks bust. Wallace is possibly going to be better. 
8 or 9 starters out of two drafts is really good. 

Good God the cupboard was barren a year ago

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PadresPanthersFan said:

Good God the cupboard was barren a year ago

Yeah well Wallace sucked, Brooks was a huge disappointment, and XL was just okay but has rented the doghouse this year. 
All we had was Sanders, Smith Wade, and Jackson. Those down ballot guys take a little time to ripen. 
If Wallace turns out to be decent add him in. 
And I forgot about Sanders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

The only slight negative is Ransom and Moehrig have a lot of overlapping skill set.  I wish we could get Richardson in a little bit too.

Ransom was asked to do everything at Ohio State. I believe he can play wherever when needed. He can play free, strong, cover, and play run defense. He looks to be better than Richardson, but Richardson does need reps. Maybe they can play him at ILB like Moehrig did some Sunday since we are so abysmal there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

The only slight negative is Ransom and Moehrig have a lot of overlapping skill set.  I wish we could get Richardson in a little bit too.

The Panthers HATE pass covering safeties. Always have, always will. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, strato said:

Yeah well Wallace sucked, Brooks was a huge disappointment, and XL was just okay but has rented the doghouse this year. 
All we had was Sanders, Smith Wade, and Jackson. Those down ballot guys take a little time to ripen. 
If Wallace turns out to be decent add him in. 
And I forgot about Sanders. 

Brooks will either rise from the dead and become a Thomas Davis level player or he will go down as the second coming of Eric Shelton. I'm betting it's the latter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...