Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not to early to talk 2026 Hall of Fame nominees


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

You are selling Smith short by not acknowledging his numbers. Go check all time receiving yards and all purpose yards for receivers. If I remember correctly he’s I think #3 all time behind only Jerry Rice and Tim Brown for all purpose yards. It’s crazy how everybody acts like he’s some fringe guy that needs to wait his turn. The HOF should have been publicly shamed for putting Andre Johnson in ahead of him.

Smitty’s career numbers to me are the 2nd most bonkers in NFL history among wideouts behind only Rice. He put up what he did on run-first offenses his entire career with mostly below average QBing. Most the other guys in the top 10 had elite QBs and all of them were in several pass-first offenses

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Depends what you mean by "better than Fitzgerald"

At each of their peaks, sure, Smitty was the far more dangerous player and would absolutely strike more fear into opposing DC's than Fitz did.  But Fitzgerald definitely had a better career and is a clear cut 1st ballot HOFer, something as much as I love Smitty, never was going to be of course.

Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder. 
 

The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown. 
 

Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season. 
 

The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.  
I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot. 
But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, strato said:

These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.  
I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot. 
But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 

100% agree. The eye test alone shows how great he was. 

And his prime years were with average to well below average QB play.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, strato said:

Jake is in my Hall of Fame and he’ll have to settle for that. 

Smitty deserves it on talent and what he did for his team (not to his teammates). I am not feeling Smitty making it this year. 

Luke should be a first ballot IMO.

 

Luke should have been but was snubbed last year because Meion "fug face" Sanders cried that too many people were getting in and making him feel insecure so they changed the voting requirements 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve Smith should absolutely be in the HOF. He's not because of his personality, not his accomplishments on the field.

Luke Kuechly should be first ballot, everyone knows that he was a HOF level player. 

Olsen, Kalil, TD, are all probably going to wait for a down year opportunity. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Steve Smith should absolutely be in the HOF. He's not because of his personality, not his accomplishments on the field.

Luke Kuechly should be first ballot, everyone knows that he was a HOF level player. 

Olsen, Kalil, TD, are all probably going to wait for a down year opportunity. 

Pretty sure Luke gets in this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, strato said:

Jake is in my Hall of Fame and he’ll have to settle for that. 

Smitty deserves it on talent and what he did for his team (not to his teammates). I am not feeling Smitty making it this year. 

Luke should be a first ballot IMO.

 

Luke’s shorter career is the only knock. If he played like 3 more years he would have been in first tear

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No. They have cracked down on the first ballot stuff recently because of complaints from the old guys.

Who that compares to Luke was denied the 1st ballot honor? Maybe I should look. 
I am biased I guess but I don’t think with an extra 3 years with no decline, how could they legitimately deny him? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It puts more pressure on being right, I always feel trading back is the move 97/100 times. There are times where you fall in love and if that guy is only 7 spots away and the cost is only a 6th or pick swap......why not?? so long the cost is low, Im more willing to do so.  Still one of the best teams at trading back and they torn apart the Panthers on those trades; Pats. You still have to pick the players, that's what happens. In theory you should also add picks, but it does get to point of eight 3rd rounders or two late 1st and a 2nd?? I mean every draft is different, so the talent maybe not fall off a cliff after pick 50. Case by case deal, but vastly I prefer to trade back.....another curve if you trade back and the scouts/coaches have not planned for it. You have to be ready and know the spot you are trading too (everyone). Just like trading out of 1st round two weeks before the draft, that hurts your team as they have been focused on pick 10 and now its wait until pick 42.... 
    • 🏈 Offense QB: Jack Trudeau RB: Derek Loville FB: Howard Griffith WR: Mark Carrier WR: Willie Green TE: Wesley Walls LT: Todd Steussie LG: Matt Elliott 😄 Jeff Christy RG: Lance Scott RT: Blake Brockermeyer 🛡️ Defense DE: Kevin Greene DT: Eric Swann DT: Greg Kragen DE: Frank Kearse OLB: Lamar Lathon MLB: Sam Mills OLB: Michael Barrow CB: Tyrone Poole CB: Richard Buckner S: Brett Maxie S: Chad Cota
    • IDK, just I know these mock drafts are time "wasters" and even more before FA cause that does change a huge portion of the needs. I think Panthers are in on Lloyd, but just like Milton Williams if the numbers get too high they will change course and still sign one of the lesser ILB. I've also seen reports Panthers want boom back as well, but as STer/backup.   Personally Ive put Wallance in the Ickey, Brooks zone....... Acting like he's not on the team and if he shows out during OTAs, mini, and TC GREEEAT!!! I feel Panthers need to sign at least one and draft 1-2....hell even add another Bam-like UDFA in the UD pool too. Trade is on the table, there have been many trades than past years......   Given the team history, the LB corp is saddest ever. Still the league isnt paying ILB and Panthers finally got with that trend. I do feel Evero wants a IBL that can blitz and everyone wants one able to pass cover.  I feel no matter what, Panthers will draft one in the mid rounds and add a couple in the UDFA class. 
×
×
  • Create New...