Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

These guys nail the basics on Bryce/Canales/Carolina

CRA

By CRA,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Mills said:

When Chris said: "If Mike Vrabel was brought here to coach this team and Canales was on the Patriots, what just happened to the Panthers would've happened to the Patriots". 

That's a sobering thought and brings the state of of our franchise and decision makers into perspective. If that's clear to everyone inside and outside of the building, then changes need to be made.... But you can't change ownership

I haven’t listened to it but if Vrabel didn’t get a different QB for his Panthers squad I can’t agree. 
 

But here is the thing with that: if you told Vrabel he was tied to Bryce for two years, he would not accept the job, IMO. He doesn’t have to. 
Canales was only getting a job as HC if he accepted that condition 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)

mike kaye just gave a brutally honest assessment of this team/franchise/coach etc on the OG podcast.  Damn that dude isnt scared of the teppers.  Says canales could be in real trouble if this all fails and its failing massively, would get a 3rd year but with major changes.

 

38 minutes in

 

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

Refuses to pass on 3rd downs despite being down to the point you have to pass and take chances.  Subs him out on QB sneaks.  Refuses to try a Hail Mary from around the 50 down multiple scores, instead runs a little baby TE screen.  Rarely schemes up deep throws.  Runs more often than passes in goal to go because they don’t trust his decision making.  
 

these have all been trends for SEASONS WITH  BRYCE, except for the Hail Mary screen.  Again, if you have a QB that you prefer to sub out situationally, you don’t have a QB.  The fact that we are at this point after so much fuging overwhelming evidence is mind blowing.  He has to have paid someone off or got dirty pictures of someone, because I just can’t fuging understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Refuses to pass on 3rd downs despite being down to the point you have to pass and take chances.  Subs him out on QB sneaks.  Refuses to try a Hail Mary from around the 50 down multiple scores, instead runs a little baby TE screen.  Rarely schemes up deep throws.  Runs more often than passes in goal to go because they don’t trust his decision making.  
 

these have all been trends for SEASONS WITH  BRYCE, except for the Hail Mary screen.  Again, if you have a QB that you prefer to sub out situationally, you don’t have a QB.  The fact that we are at this point after so much fuging overwhelming evidence is mind blowing.  He has to have paid someone off or got dirty pictures of someone, because I just can’t fuging understand.

Yep I mean that’s what it comes down to. Analyzing this in a play-by-play manner doesn’t help (although I’ll still respect those who want to dig into that mess)

When you have someone who inhibits the plays you can deploy, the concepts you can scheme in, it’s such a limiting factor and you won’t rise out of it until you try another guy at the spot.  He limits the entire system down to physical, unchangeable traits… we are restricted in what we can run, and he can’t even run the limited playbook effectively. So that’s why I stopped bothering with play-by-play looks. It’s clear it’s the bigger infrastructural issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
  • Author
Posted
14 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Refuses to pass on 3rd downs despite being down to the point you have to pass and take chances.  Subs him out on QB sneaks.  Refuses to try a Hail Mary from around the 50 down multiple scores, instead runs a little baby TE screen.  Rarely schemes up deep throws.  Runs more often than passes in goal to go because they don’t trust his decision making.  
 

these have all been trends for SEASONS WITH  BRYCE, except for the Hail Mary screen.  Again, if you have a QB that you prefer to sub out situationally, you don’t have a QB.  The fact that we are at this point after so much fuging overwhelming evidence is mind blowing.  He has to have paid someone off or got dirty pictures of someone, because I just can’t fuging understand.

Deep throws are there.  You insert a different QB and that QB just looks to execute them. 

We have seen that every year when Bryce gets benched.  Datlon will push the D back and crank it 30 or 40+. 

Issue is Dalton is just washed.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jmac
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By Jmac · Posted

      Nope
    • cranky
      Who is going to take a shot at Malik Willis

      By cranky · Posted

      So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • cranky
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By cranky · Posted

      Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...