Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How I play the team rebuild and Bryce Young if I was the GM


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think a bigger elephant is the owner. If he pushed for Bryce then he’s going to make Canales do anything and everything to make him work. And again with Tepper, we know how he has meddled in the past and I’m not convinced he has been twiddling his thumbs and staying out of the way. Just remember that any and all decisions are ran thru him and his wife and I’m not confident at all that this team will be anything more than horrible while Dave is the owner.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell Yes to Saleh

draft bpa, team is starving for talent, sign a vet qb and maybe draft a qb in the late rounds until this team has a clear direction 

we a need wr again cause our gm is mid 

Winston would be a nice get for the culture of the locker room and to give these WRs a fair look on what there abilities can be 

all sounds good op but we’ve been preaching logical moves the entire tepper tenure yet they’ve chosen the opposite, I wouldn’t get our hopes up 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Coker stays healthy he will show out as the #1 WR. The starting o line is solid but we got snake bit quick. I agree on continue to draft o-line. 
 

If Bryce is really the problem I’d expose him and remove checkdowns and force him to throw. Seems like he builds momentum by Dave calling deep routes and letting the TE eat on check downs he throws. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...