Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4 to 6 games into the season, do we know this teams identity?


Dragoon11
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was paraphrasing, but I believe Dave Canales said something close to this. I personally believe on offense, playmakers are emerging. Bryce is still making mistakes, but he's not letting it get to him and keeps battling, and making plays in crucial moments. On defense, the run D is much improved. But, and we desperately need a consistent pass rush, we could be deadly if we had it. We seem to be loaded at the RB position. Even Etienne looks good! And I'm loving what I'm seeing from Jimmy Horn. I think this kid will end up being something special. What's your take 6 weeks in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SaltAndPepper said:

Run the damn ball and don't let them run the damn ball..., keep their defense on the field to tire them out and keep ours off the field to keep them fresh... when they're tired slice them up with PA with BY... that's about as much as an identity we've had this decade.

Really good point! Plays right into the "keep pounding" mantra. When this team has been successful over the years it has usually been because of our dominant run game... and defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PleaseCutStewart said:

Our identity: run the ball and then run the ball some more+ shut down the run on defense 

Interesting that when Canales was at Seattle, that was their recipe for success huh? Ironic? Nahhh, that's how you win in the NFL, by imposing your will up front!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are few football truths. Defense wins championships and games are won in the trenches!!! Every team wants the next high flying offense like the chiefs and the next Patrick Mahomes, but even they lost in the Super Bowl against the Eagles who played defense and ran the ball. People think Hurts is a great QB, but their 2 losses this season exposed him when you try to put the ball in his hands and make him throw it 30+ times per game, they lose. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It’s not sustainable but it’s been damn fun.  

I agree that 200 rushing yards a game isn’t sustainable but I think we can end up finishing as a top 5 rushing attack this year. It’s what our O-line personal is built for. Plus, rushing the ball is the only thing we’re good at so it’s pretty much the only answer to OP’s question. That and stopping the run. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I agree that 200 rushing yards a game isn’t sustainable but I think we can end up finishing as a top 5 rushing attack this year. It’s what our O-line personal is built for. Plus, rushing the ball is the only thing we’re good at so it’s pretty much the only answer to OP’s question. That and stopping the run. 

Absolutely 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...