Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we get to 9-8?


Randolph Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

All I wanted this year was to see some improvement from last year.  I thought we could win between 7 and 10 games this year and haven't seen anything to change my mind.  Jets, Saints, and pull a couple of upsets along the way and we met the mark of improving.

To actually have a shot at the playoffs will require playing better in a few areas, such as rushing the passer.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Not this season. The die has been cast. Vegas had us at 6.5 wins for the season and after the Jets i cannot see another realistic shot at a win. It would take a lot of people playing much better than they have and a lot of luck staying healthy to touch 8 wins.

I think we could split with the Saints.  Thats 5.   Then it gets tough to find more given the schedule.  Maybe catch a resting Tampa team to get to 6 but 6 gets hard to really figure out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

I think we could split with the Saints.  Thats 5.   Then it gets tough to find more given the schedule.  Maybe catch a resting Tampa team to get to 6 but 6 gets hard to really figure out.  

Its hard to predict injuries and bad luck in the future. But it's pretty much a given with the Panthers. Having said that, I will say that I still don't see any reason yet to doubt Vegas. Until they upset a playoff team or two later in the season when the caliber of opponents get tougher I'm sticking with under on what Vegas set. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Its hard to predict injuries and bad luck in the future. But it's pretty much a given with the Panthers. Having said that, I will say that I still don't see any reason yet to doubt Vegas. Until they upset a playoff team or two later in the season when the caliber of opponents get tougher I'm sticking with under on what Vegas set. 

I agree.  You also can’t predict the Atlanta type games where a team just implodes.  I mean a random punt returner can gift a game off two muffs and you win a game you really couldn’t in a normal scenario 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, strato said:

We could beat a decent team if our QB had a career type day and theirs had an off day. You just never know. 
 

Which teams are decent? At this point you never know in this league. 

Bryce is playing better he already has 10 TDs in 6 games which is a huge step up from what he gave us the first 2 seasons. Our D could be nasty if we had some kind of pass rush develop.

We could also spiral into a huge losing streak....who knows. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PootieNunu said:

Which teams are decent? At this point you never know in this league. 

Bryce is playing better he already has 10 TDs in 6 games which is a huge step up from what he gave us the first 2 seasons. Our D could be nasty if we had some kind of pass rush develop.

We could also spiral into a huge losing streak....who knows. 

 

 

 

It does vary, and depends on their health and other factors. I mean you really can’t look at the schedule in August and know what you will be facing mid season or even early October. Pick a month. Any time because stuff happens. It is any given Sunday relative to that.

Early this year, KC was beatable. Will they be in December? And we don’t know if they’ll be motivated, or out of it. One team, that is likely a different team in 10 weeks. That’s an example of what I mean. 
Far as “decent” we know who the good teams are. We could hit a good team on a bad day, and we could have a really good one. It happens. All I’m saying.

And I don’t expect it not to, for random teams. That’s about it. Predicting wins is an imperfect pastime. 
 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise. 

Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...