Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young - High Ankle Sprain, out minimum 1 week


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Bryce Young injured his right ankle during the Week 2 game against the New Orleans Saints in the 2023 NFL season. The injury caused him to miss the following week’s game against the Seattle Seahawks but he was back for week 4 

Nobody saw him limping that I remember. ? Or could find the play he hurt it on. Something like that. 
It felt like Frank was forcing the issue to a lot of people. He had wanted to sit him I am pretty sure.

One of his last attempts at forcing some sanity on Tepper. That was the game where Andy at least made it enjoyable. NFL like.  

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super Grateful said:

they definitely are. I remember hearing Canales talking about how "we know we have our QB" after the way he finished last season. he hasn't done enough to lose that praise in their eyes and now we have to pause evaluation. unless he shids the bed when he comes back, his 200 yd, 2 td 1 int games playing .500 ball will get him a contract with us. 

I mean, he knew Bryce would be back, he wasn't going to say "next year we still have to evaluate if he's our guy"

There's just no way they can objectively look at him and say he's earned picking up the option year so far, that would be ridiculous to guarantee $27 million to a guy who is ranking last in the league in passing yards despite being 10th in attempts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I mean, he knew Bryce would be back, he wasn't going to say "next year we still have to evaluate if he's our guy"

There's just no way they can objectively look at him and say he's earned picking up the option year so far, that would be ridiculous to guarantee $27 million to a guy who is ranking last in the league in passing yards despite being 10th in attempts.

Yeah. They are talking as much  ti the player a lot of times, as they are to the fans. Build him up. 
He could have meant it too but to broadcast it, it had a purpose even if he didn’t believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a HAS when I was in college. Thing blew up to the size of a grapefruit. Couldn't even see the actual ankle anymore. I was able to come back pretty quickly, a couple of weeks IIRC. But that ish lingered for a good 8 fugging MONTHS. Could technically still play, but I was limping around like a little bitch.

Just thought I'd share.

Edited by R0CKnR0LLA
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Had a HAS when I was in college. Thing blew up to the size of a grapefruit. Couldn't even see the actual ankle anymore. I was able to come back pretty quickly, a couple of weeks IIRC. But that ish lingered for a good 8 fugging MONTHS. Could technically still play, but I was limping around like a little bitch.

Just thought I'd share.

Great. An excuse for the whole year now. That is fuging great. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2025 at 12:15 PM, electro's horse said:

And he's not the type of athlete that's gonna heal from anything. 

I'm a dumb dumb, what do you mean that he's a type of athlete that not going to heal?  No sarcasm, snideness, just being honest.  Personally, I've never heard of different types of athletes ability to heal or not.  Or maybe I'm over/under thinking...or I'm distracted.

You seem to have a lot more knowledge than I do about how feet and ankles work 😃  Please enlighten me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, d-dave said:

I'm a dumb dumb, what do you mean that he's a type of athlete that not going to heal?  No sarcasm, snideness, just being honest.  Personally, I've never heard of different types of athletes ability to heal or not.  Or maybe I'm over/under thinking...or I'm distracted.

You seem to have a lot more knowledge than I do about how feet and ankles work 😃  Please enlighten me!

There's a lot of reasons for this! Bryce is a good athlete for a person his size, but bigger athletes are better athletes, and the bodies work more efficiently. Not just at the mechanical level, but at the cellular. Bigger, faster athletes require better, more efficient systems etc. 

1. Physiologic reserve - Bryce is a smaller, more slender guy. There's just not a lot of him. people with less amounts of muscle mass (generally) will heal more slowly than someone like Cam. Similarly, peole with high amounts of body fat will heal from mechanical injuries more slowly than someone with less BF and similar lean muscle mass. It's just one of those things.

Same thing with how his actual injury doesn't look like much. Imagine an NFL player suffering some horrific looking injury and being fine in two plays. Then think of how easy it was, even when you were young, to roll your ankle and be down for 2 weeks. 

2. Less blood flow - blood flow leads to healing, especially with tendon injuries because they're not inherently vascular. High ankle sprains are actually a bone injury as well. Bryce is just little. There's not a lot of blood in there to transport the healing blood factors. Imagine how tiny his ankles are. This is similar to the reason Alex Smith had such a radical surgery to heal an infection in his shin/calf; there's just not a lot of meat there to bring blood to get in antibiotics in there to fight the infection. So they cut a hunk of flesh off his thigh and attached it to his shin. Looks awful, but it worked. 

3. Can't handle as much rehab - he's smaller, will get tired more quickly, will take longer to recover, etc. 

4. medical history - really only had one injury in the past, it was an "ac sprain" after a tackle against TAMU, and it took him weeks to recover. 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

There's a lot of reasons for this! Bryce is a good athlete for a person his size, but bigger athletes are better athletes, and the bodies work more efficiently. Not just at the mechanical level, but at the cellular. Bigger, faster athletes require better, more efficient systems etc. 

1. Physiologic reserve - Bryce is a smaller, more slender guy. There's just not a lot of him. people with less amounts of muscle mass (generally) will heal more slowly than someone like Cam. Similarly, peole with high amounts of body fat will heal from mechanical injuries more slowly than someone with less BF and similar lean muscle mass. It's just one of those things.

Same thing with how his actual injury doesn't look like much. Imagine an NFL player suffering some horrific looking injury and being fine in two plays. Then think of how easy it was, even when you were young, to roll your ankle and be down for 2 weeks. 

2. Less blood flow - blood flow leads to healing, especially with tendon injuries because they're not inherently vascular. High ankle sprains are actually a bone injury as well. Bryce is just little. There's not a lot of blood in there to transport the healing blood factors. Imagine how tiny his ankles are. This is similar to the reason Alex Smith had such a radical surgery to heal an infection in his shin/calf; there's just not a lot of meat there to bring blood to get in antibiotics in there to fight the infection. So they cut a hunk of flesh off his thigh and attached it to his shin. Looks awful, but it worked. 

3. Can't handle as much rehab - he's smaller, will get tired more quickly, will take longer to recover, etc. 

4. medical history - really only had one injury in the past, it was an "ac sprain" after a tackle against TAMU, and it took him weeks to recover. 

 

Awesome!  Thank you for the smart person input!  I almost feel as smart as someone who slept in a Holiday Inn Express!

(My god, what a terrible reference!)

It makes sense.  I'm a large person with a lot of muscle mass (but saw how terrible my endurance has gotten this year yesterday - WTF life!), and I never get seriously hurt despite smashing my fingers, hands, feet, head and all sorts of limb on doors, desks, 3/4" sheets of plywood, etc. I do on a daily basis.  I just thought I healed faster than others, small biological win.  But that it's just my body is just bigger and better at allocating resources.

Again, super interesting!

Edited by d-dave
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thing working against bryce is he sprained his ankle by rolling it OUT (eversion), not IN (inversion). 

Ankle joint is MUCH stronger against eversion than the opposite. you can try this by sitting at your desk. Put the outside edge of your foot on the floor. Easy, right? Do the same with the opposite side. 

An everted broken ankle is actually an ortho trauma emergency, because if the trauma was strong enough to evert and break it, it probably did neurovascular damage as well.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, electro's horse said:

another thing working against bryce is he sprained his ankle by rolling it OUT (eversion), not IN (inversion). 

Ankle joint is MUCH stronger against eversion than the opposite. you can try this by sitting at your desk. Put the outside edge of your foot on the floor. Easy, right? Do the same with the opposite side. 

An everted broken ankle is actually an ortho trauma emergency, because if the trauma was strong enough to evert and break it, it probably did neurovascular damage as well.

Not that your earlier points weren't interesting too but this is what I was wondering about with the injury and potential recovery time. I always had this "hunch" about rolling in vs out just from my own experiences.  Insightful stuff, thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't care about that this team has been an almost "ran" for like 8 years now, they had more cap space a surplus of assets, and did nothing to fix this teams fatal flaws. This season ends it five games or less to tampa..... bookmark it.
    • from joe person       In round two, we had Morgan making a trade with Seattle Seahawks GM John Schneider, Morgan’s former boss in Seattle. The Panthers moved back from 51 to 56 (which Seattle had traded up for), while getting the Seahawks’ third-round pick (96) and giving up one of their fifths (158). The deal left Carolina with four selections in the top 100. Round 1, No. 19 Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia Something about mock season always leads us back to the SEC. After taking Miami edge rusher Akheem Mesidor in this spot last month, we brushed up on our math and figured out that, while talented, Mesidor will be pushing 30 when it’s time for his second contract. That doesn’t seem like a Morgan move, despite having also starred at The U. Freeling, who turns 22 the first week of training camp, was viewed initially by some teams as a late-first-round prospect. But his stock has risen as scouts have gotten more of a look at the 6-7, 315-pounder with 33¾-inch arms. Freeling showed off his athleticism in Indianapolis, running a 40 in 4.93 seconds with a 1.72-second, 10-yard split. Freeling started only one full season at Georgia and is still developing. The Panthers could also sign a veteran such as Yosh Nijman to replace injured Ikem Ekwonu and help Freeling get ready to take over. The question is whether Freeling will be available at 19. The Athletic’s Dane Brugler has him going to the Miami Dolphins at 11 in his two-round mock that dropped Wednesday. But at least one NFC talent personnel executive thinks Freeling could fall to the Panthers. In round two, we had Morgan making a trade with Seattle Seahawks GM John Schneider, Morgan’s former boss in Seattle. The Panthers moved back from 51 to 56 (which Seattle had traded up for), while getting the Seahawks’ third-round pick (96) and giving up one of their fifths (158). The deal left Carolina with four selections in the top 100.   Round 2, No. 56 (from SEA) Jacob Rodriguez, LB, Texas Tech As mentioned above, don’t be surprised if the Panthers open their wallets next week for Devin Lloyd, Kaden Elliss or one of the other top free-agent linebackers. It’s a position that needs to be addressed with a big swing, if not more. And the second round feels like the sweet spot for playmaking, off-ball linebackers. In our initial mock, we went with Texas linebacker Anthony Hill Jr., a 6-3, 238-pounder with big upside as a blitzer. But while Hill’s coverage skills are still a work in progress, Rodriguez will arrive in the NFL as a three-down ‘backer who had four interceptions last year for the Red Raiders. The 6-1, 231-pound Rodriguez finished his career with 19 forced turnovers, so he knows how to be disruptive around the ball. Brugler, who also has Rodriguez going to Carolina in the second round, noted that Texas Tech coaches called him the “quarterback of the defense.” That sounds like a former Panthers linebacker who will be receiving a gold jacket this summer.     Round 3, No. 83 Jake Slaughter, C, Florida The Panthers haven’t taken an offensive lineman in two drafts with Morgan as GM. But he could draft two this year, depending on how Cade Mays’ free agency plays out and what the Panthers’ plan is to replace Mays if he signs elsewhere. Along with Auburn’s Connor Lew, Slaughter is considered one of the top centers in the draft. And the 6-5, 303-pounder appears poised to be a plug-and-play guy from Day 1, having started more than 30 games over five seasons in Gainesville. Slaughter is 83rd in Brugler’s rankings, so this was really the perfect spot for him. Slaughter graduated last spring with a degree in agricultural education and communication and was on the SEC’s academic honor roll his final four seasons. Just as importantly, Slaughter is said to have a high football IQ, critical at the center position.   Round 3, No. 96 (from SEA) Keyron Crawford, edge, Auburn This could be one of those classic cases of a team (or mock drafter) scouting one player from a Power 4 team and developing a draft crush on one of his teammates. Auburn defensive end Keldric Faulk has been mocked to the Panthers by a couple of draft analysts, and it’s not hard to see why. The 6-6, 276-pound Faulk has impressive length and a high ceiling. But Crawford had more production than Faulk last season, finishing with more tackles, sacks, tackles for loss and passes defended than his more publicized teammate. Not bad for someone who didn’t start playing football until his senior year at his Memphis high school. True, the 6-4, 253-pound Crawford is a bit undersized. But his explosive first step, effort at all three levels and upside make him an excellent value pick late on the second day of the draft.   Round 4, No. 119 Chris McClellan, DT, Missouri The Panthers’ defense was improved last season, thanks in part to the return of defensive tackle Derrick Brown, a Pro Bowler in 2023. Brown finished with a career-high five sacks, tying Nic Scourton for the team lead. Still, the Panthers could use a pass-rushing interior lineman, especially with the team expected to trade or release A’Shawn Robinson in a cost-cutting move. Enter McClellan, the Florida transfer whose six sacks last season were more than his total from the previous three seasons combined. The 6-4, 313-pound McClellan looks the part with his 34-inch arms and 11-inch hands, among the largest of any player in the draft. Brugler believes McClelland has the strength to handle the point of attack and push the pocket as a rusher, calling him “an underrated player who will be part of a rotation for a long time.”   Round 5, No. 162 Kendrick Law, WR, Kentucky Before digging in on Law, it’s worth mentioning that the Panthers drafting a receiver in the first round for the third year in a row isn’t out of the question, depending on how their board shakes out. Is it likely? Probably not, but worth keeping in mind.     The Panthers would like to diversify their receiving room with a speedy, shifty athlete who can make plays after the catch and in the run game. They took a flyer on one in the sixth round last year in former Colorado wideout Jimmy Horn, who had a couple of splash plays as a rookie. Maybe Morgan and Dave Canales try it again with another Day-3 receiver. If so, the 5-11, 203-pound Law is worth a look. He transferred to Kentucky in 2025 after three years at Alabama and led the Wildcats in receptions (53) and receiving yards (540), a good chunk of which came on yards after the catch on bubble screens and other quick-hitting throws. Law doesn’t have blinding speed (he ran a 4.45-second 40 in Indy), but he has good hands and can break tackles in space. Plus, he returned kicks at Alabama and Kentucky, averaging 23 yards over the past three seasons. Round 6, No. 200 T.J. Hall, cornerback, Iowa With Mike Jackson in the final year of his contract and nearing his 30s, it’s not too early to start thinking about a succession plan. Teams typically don’t find starting corners late in the third day. And even those who do develop often take time. Jackson, a fifth-round pick in 2019, didn’t become a starter until 2022 in Seattle, his fourth team in three years. All of which to say that realistic expectations are needed for anyone who would have appeared in this space, including Hall, who at least has the size (6-1, 189) the Panthers look for in their corners. Hall only had two interceptions for the Hawkeyes and isn’t a burner. But he led Iowa with 10 pass breakups last season and was a willing tackler, with a team-high eight tackles in their bowl win over Vanderbilt.        
    • At the end of the season. Before the playoffs.
×
×
  • Create New...