Canes vs Aves 9pm

[philit99]

9 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Had no business winning that game. TY Freddie 

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

[Panthers Fan 69]

1 hour ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

I think he just means down slavin ghost and miller and losing carrier and Robinson Mia game. Having to play 3 rookies while the forwards are double shifting and playing sell out defense.   I watched a team with heart absolutely sucking wind and out of gas. But they hung on.  Full roster, yea we win that by 2-3. 

[WelshPanther]

2 hours ago, philit99 said:

I disagree. We were down 3 defensemen and 2 forwards. We worked hard and the refs were doing everything possible to make this a game. If we were full strength we win that game by 2 goals. Also, whoever is advising Rod from the truck needs to do a better job. Their second goal, was not a goal.

We challenged the goal and lost didn’t we?

[Anybodyhome]

So, the goal that should not have been a goal....

https://www.nhl.com/news/carolina-hurricanes-colorado-avalanche-coach-challenge-x1595

Challenge Initiated By: Carolina

Type of Challenge: Missed Game Stoppage Event – High-Sticking the Puck

Result: Original call confirmed – Goal Colorado

Explanation: The Situation Room supported the Referee’s call on the ice that Parker Kelly’s stick was not above the normal height of his shoulders when he contacted the puck at 15:31 of the second period (4:29 elapsed time) – 17 seconds prior to his goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 80.1.

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

------------------------------------------------------------

How the challenge was interpreted as a high stick challenge is beyond me. What I cannot find is what/how RBA challenged the goal and how it was reviewed as a high stick goal when Stevie Wonder could see the hand extending off Kelly's stick, essentially grabbing at the puck and it went by Freddie. 

But the note says, "...17 seconds prior to his goal." So I have no clue that they even looked at the hand goal. 

Edited October 24, 2025 by Anybodyhome

[PantherChris]

Jarvis has brought his game to super star level so far this season...

[Kuhndog94]

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Jarvis has brought his game to super star level so far this season...

$7.42M/YR might just be the steal of the century tbh. 

[Darkseid89]

29 minutes ago, Kuhndog94 said:

$7.42M/YR might just be the steal of the century tbh. 

He will be the 40 goal guy we’ve needed for years, who plays all phases. Homegrown. 

[Kuhndog94]

37 minutes ago, Darkseid89 said:

He will be the 40 goal guy we’ve needed for years, who plays all phases. Homegrown. 

I definitely see a Hart/Selke trophy in his future. 

[DavidEng]

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

So, the goal that should not have been a goal....

https://www.nhl.com/news/carolina-hurricanes-colorado-avalanche-coach-challenge-x1595

Challenge Initiated By: Carolina

Type of Challenge: Missed Game Stoppage Event – High-Sticking the Puck

Result: Original call confirmed – Goal Colorado

Explanation: The Situation Room supported the Referee’s call on the ice that Parker Kelly’s stick was not above the normal height of his shoulders when he contacted the puck at 15:31 of the second period (4:29 elapsed time) – 17 seconds prior to his goal. The decision was made in accordance with Rule 80.1.

Penalty: 2:00 minor penalty: Delay of Game – Unsuccessful Challenge

------------------------------------------------------------

How the challenge was interpreted as a high stick challenge is beyond me. What I cannot find is what/how RBA challenged the goal and how it was reviewed as a high stick goal when Stevie Wonder could see the hand extending off Kelly's stick, essentially grabbing at the puck and it went by Freddie. 

But the note says, "...17 seconds prior to his goal." So I have no clue that they even looked at the hand goal. 

I believe what they were saying is the hand deflection into the goal  was not something a coach could challenge (although the officials could have called for a review of the goal). There were only three criteria a coach could use to challenge a goal and Rod had only a missed stoppage as something he thought he could use. Basically the officials blew it.

Edited October 24, 2025 by DavidEng