Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young ankle injury is “just a one-week injury”


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, strato said:

If Andy throws for 500 yards well you bench him for the guy that will give you 180. Of course. 
 

Onay then, this is funny poo but the goal is to have Bryce prove what he can do with the team they built for him

So we hope he can play and be healthy and show what he has.  Because we need to see that he can be the QB to go forward with. Once and for all. 

 

10 hours ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Not saying he will but if Andy throws 3TDs and 400 yards, will it still be a 1 week injury?

If we’re throwing that much against Buffalo, we seriously messed the game plan and probably lost. 
 

Buffalo is giving up nearly 170 yards rushing per game. There’s NO reason to come out slinging it everywhere.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, La Pantera said:

 

If we’re throwing that much against Buffalo, we seriously messed the game plan and probably lost. 
 

Buffalo is giving up nearly 170 yards rushing per game. There’s NO reason to come out slinging it everywhere.

If it isn't a heavy dose of Rico early and often, you will have a pretty good idea of the outcome, I suspect.

Huddle wants Rico heavy running and play action passing.

Watch almost none of that actually happen on Sunday.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

 

If we’re throwing that much against Buffalo, we seriously messed the game plan and probably lost. 
 

Buffalo is giving up nearly 170 yards rushing per game. There’s NO reason to come out slinging it everywhere.

My 500 yards thing was answering a disgruntled Bryce fan who was trolling/mocking. 
IOW it wasn’t based in reality. Offhand, 225, 1 TD, lots of rushing yards is closer to what a good game from the offense would look like. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

 

If we’re throwing that much against Buffalo, we seriously messed the game plan and probably lost. 
 

Buffalo is giving up nearly 170 yards rushing per game. There’s NO reason to come out slinging it everywhere.

You run to set up the deep pass on PA.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Lol he was benched

I will admit, it is odd that even if he’s declared healthy, he wouldn’t start. To me, if he’s “the guy” if he’s healthy, he plays. I’m not saying this is a benching, just odd wording by Schefter. I would imagine the team is just playing it safe with him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I will admit, it is odd that even if he’s declared healthy, he wouldn’t start. To me, if he’s “the guy” if he’s healthy, he plays. I’m not saying this is a benching, just odd wording by Schefter. I would imagine the team is just playing it safe with him? 

It is strange, but no less surreal than him being the 1.1 in the NFL draft. 
If I were in the situation the team is in, I would be Not want to aggravate that injury and would be overly cautious. He needs to be fully healthy so he can properly evaluated in these games that are coming up. 
They see Dalton in practice, they saw the film from Sunday. Maybe he has looked good enough that they think a side benefit to the caution is getting to look at the offense with a different guy running it. 
 

The worst thing that could come out of it is Bryce is hampered the rest of the season 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Super Grateful said:

jesus christ, what weird subforum did I stumble upon where people are talking like Dalton is this incredible back up that is going to throw for 400 yards and 4 TD's like we haven't seen him in this role before, and that there is this master plan to fake Bryce's high ankle sprain in order to bench him during a winning season with favorable stats?

You had me until the literal last 2 words of this post

favorable stats?

Bryce is literally in LAST place in passing yards amongst the QBs who have started every week this season.

But sure, I guess you could consider that "favorable"

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...