Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB options for the 2026 season


CBird
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, strato said:

I am not going to argue and say people don’t do that, but bro… you talking about two games. I am talking about .. all the other ones. 

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 


I don’t understand your contention that Rico’s two great games or Daniel Jones and Taylor’s play have relevance to my point  

Every QB benefits from a great running back. No argument. The point was clear, teams crowd the near field vs Young same as they did with Cam after he lost his gun. Because? They don’t fear being beat deep. 
 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I haven't looked but im estimated guessing that Daniel Jones only flashed in NY when Barkley was balling out. And now hes doing well in Indy because JT is on pace for 30 TDs. I wasn't replying saying hes poo im just backing the brinks truck up for him in FA 

Yeah, Jones got carried by Saquan and now he's being carried by Jonathan Taylor who is probably the MVP at the halfway point of the season. Bryce has basically been ass per usual except when Rico is running for 200 yards.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, csx said:

Distressed assets are quality assets that are undervalued because of current management or ownership. Mayfield seems the perfect example. Browns and Panthers were what limited him. Not him.

Jones and Mayfield were acquired cheaply because of this. 

Young doesn't fit this unless you think hes actually much better than he appears to be.

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

People forget how terrible Mayfield was here because it’s become popular to idolize him, since he’s found the perfect scenario for himself. But a 74.4 QB rating (worse than Bryce) a 1-1 TD-INT ratio (worse than Bryce) and a .200 win percentage (worse than Bryce somehow!) meant he was actually better than Bryce here. It’s great that people want to improve the QB room because it definitely needs it, if not an overhaul. But the whole “it wasn’t Baker’s fault” has to be from people who didn’t watch in 2022.

Wasnt Baker coming off injury when first here…i dont remember 

the Rhule Fitterer years were a hot mess and the franchise is still paying 

both Darnold and Baker csn play, and could play   They rose with better organizations and coaches …neither of which the Panthers had.

 Im not sure what the Panthers have now

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Gonna be interesting to see how the Colts handle that situation 

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Yea seems like the most obvious case of fools gold yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If they're smart the same way the Vikings should've handled the Darnold situation. Franchise tag. I wouldn't want to pay Jones after one year of good play while being carried by a RB having an MVP caliber season. That would probably prove to be a mistake. The franchise tag might too but at least you're free and clear after a year if it is.

Franchise tag would be insanely expensive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...