Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Team...


Jay Roosevelt
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Amazing what happens when the starting qb goes out. 

Sort of. Penix was 0 for 2 on scoring drives in the 3rd quarter and Cousins was 2 of 4 (both FGs) in the 4th including the send it to OT drive. The OL and skilled guys were all there too.

The D played well in both quarters of the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints game was the most confusing loss more than the wins. It legitimately looked like the team didn’t properly prepare for the game and that’s on the coaches. The Falcons game seemed to be a lucky game where Bryce decided to become an NFL QB for a change. He needs to show us he can play at that level against any other team than the Falcons. Post 3TDs and 350yards against the 49ers in a WIN and I’ll start buying some Bryce stock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Honestly, it was awesome to watch the win but even during the game it felt like a microcosm of this season. We come back to down 5 and then miss a 2 point conversion that takes some of the oomph out and then Young flubs 4 straight drives with stuff like spins into sacks or thinking he can run through a LB and we get 3 points on those 4 drives where it felt like we could break the game open. Defense played awesome in the second half but still gave up 2 FGs due to bad special teams and turnover on downs.

Then we get the drive to take the lead before the bad special teams and the D plays lights out in OT and we drive and win.

Also, what’s with not kicking on third down in case of a bad snap? Why would you ever run for a yard at most and risk a fumble just to give yourself 1 shot at a FG in case of a bad snap? We had plenty of timeouts and we gained almost nothing after Tremble’s catch.

 Don’t bring up logical points!!! The Huddle is on manic mode right now! Logical discussion will return after they lose again next week 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Sort of. Penix was 0 for 2 on scoring drives in the 3rd quarter and Cousins was 2 of 4 (both FGs) in the 4th including the send it to OT drive. The OL and skilled guys were all there too.

The D played well in both quarters of the second half.

They didn't have 2 drives in the 3rd. They only had 1 because the other was a turnover before the offense took the field. Penix was injured in the second drive (last play).

Screenshot_20251117-073241.png

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

They didn't have 2 drives in the 3rd. They only had 1 because the other was a turnover before the offense took the field. Penix was injured in the second drive (last play).

Screenshot_20251117-073241.png

Penis left the game with a booboo on his knee. He could have played but chose to sit on the sidelines. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also Drake was apparently hurt at some point towards the end of the first half and tried to keep playing but didn’t finish the game. The falcons other wr are all going to be working at quick trip next season.

Just like against the packers, the panthers sent a loud message to the rest of the league; no matter who you are, if you have enough injuries to key starters, we can wait until your defense gets tired and eke out a victory with a field goal. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Also Drake was apparently hurt at some point towards the end of the first half and tried to keep playing but didn’t finish the game. The falcons other wr are all going to be working at quick trip next season.

Just like against the packers, the panthers sent a loud message to the rest of the league; no matter who you are, if you have enough injuries to key starters, we can wait until your defense gets tired and eke out a victory with a field goal. 

So only Falcon injuries are valid excuse? You are thinking wayyy too much about Canales sex life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...