Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Downfield Disparity


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Waldo said:

Unhealthy OGs. Playing other bad teams early and having effective rushing attack. Playing from behind with a really bad defense last year while the other teams were in prevent/softer D. 

Ding ding ding! I think we have the winner here, folks!

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce doesn't like throwing into the middle of the field unless the play broke down or it's set up to give him a passing lane. 

So because of this issue, most of the passing offense has to be outside the numbers towards the boundary. So you see him throw a lot of dump offs, swing routes, short side out routes, comebacks or deep balls outside the numbers using the boundary as protection of an interception. 

 

Pretty easy for a NFL defense to see this and scheme against it. 

All you have to do is run a shell cover 2 deep dime, LB plays a hook underneath, take the flat away with a blitz/flat zone option for the two inside DB's, outside two DB's play hook zone underneath and carry anything deep. 

 

Pretty much what NO ran to take away Rico while also limiting What Bryce can do as well. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Bryce doesn't like throwing into the middle of the field unless the play broke down or it's set up to give him a passing lane. 

So because of this issue, most of the passing offense has to be outside the numbers towards the boundary. So you see him throw a lot of dump offs, swing routes, short side out routes, comebacks or deep balls outside the numbers using the boundary as protection of an interception. 

 

Pretty easy for a NFL defense to see this and scheme against it. 

All you have to do is run a shell cover 2 deep dime, LB plays a hook underneath, take the flat away with a blitz/flat zone option for the two inside DB's, outside two DB's play hook zone underneath and carry anything deep. 

 

Pretty much what NO ran to take away Rico while also limiting What Bryce can do as well. 

Do you know when he stopped throwing the ball over the middle? After his NFL debut where he threw two INTs to Bates because he didn't see him. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, fanpanther said:

so basically byoung is actually really great.  rest of the team and the coach suck and my eyes apparently lie to me 

You have a good two years of it right there. 
 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2025 at 5:58 PM, mav1234 said:

I feel like people assume risk-averse QBs with weak arms are great for a WCO...

Not at all.

The ideal type of QB for the WCO could be described as a...

... point guard 😕

Argument basically boils down to saying that the problem is not with system fit.

It's either play calling or execution, and the more I think about it the more I lean toward the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/11/2025 at 4:31 PM, kungfoodude said:

Well, I took a look at the Bryce "Eras" Tour and it seems like that it somewhat breaks down to.....well he just attempted more passes downfield.

Breaking it down like the author of the Twatter post did in the "This Season" chunk versus 2024 Weeks 8-18 and I also added "Rest of his Career" which is basically all of 2023 and the two games in 2024 prior to Benching. 

Initial Bryce(2023-Week 2 2024)

Capture_1.thumb.PNG.933f3f1ac20733f03ef295ff7adf2ffb.PNG

 Post Benching Bryce(Weeks 8-18 2024 AKA The Glory Games)

Capture_2.thumb.PNG.77c259feb43b44f301e29477893decb2.PNG

Modern Bryce(2025 Season)

Capture_3.thumb.PNG.f1305712547b4f4e1477314d33de49c6.PNG

 

If you look, during the "Glory Games" era of Bryce his 10+ downfield targets jumped from around 32% over his overall attempts to almost 43% of his overall attempts. Maybe it's as simple as that since he isn't testing them deep, they don't have to worry about him targeting them. 

It's an interesting look at the breakdown of those timelines.

Good work...

Mentioned above, my current lean is toward Bryce being the problem. And it takes me back to the issues we had when Mike Shula was OC.

He had on something for the 2015 season (basically heavy run focus including the QB) which is great, but simply coming up with something that works isn't enough in the NFL chess game.

If you're truly a chessmaster, you know what to do when somebody finds a way to stop it. Hell, some guys even anticipate those adjustments and plan for them.

Shula had no idea how to respond.

Last game, Bryce didn't either.

So now the big question is what happens next game 🤔

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...