Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who runs a red zone Fleaflicker?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bryce did the Cam looked at defender with the ball staring right at him just dive on the ball immediately but his processing was a tad slow especially for a super processor.

But the play call my lawd I’ve never seen such idiotic play calling before in my life. The one time we open it up we go straight down the field and score Dave confuses me every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I honestly don't think it was called. It looked to me like a busted run play that Rico lost footing and tried to throw the ball back to Young who wasn't expecting it. It was a run play all along but Rico went full retard.

No rico didnt go full retard he just made a 1M$ personal choice not to lose four yards when he slipped 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, trucpfan said:

Bryce did the Cam looked at defender with the ball staring right at him just dive on the ball immediately but his processing was a tad slow especially for a super processor.

But the play call my lawd I’ve never seen such idiotic play calling before in my life. The one time we open it up we go straight down the field and score Dave confuses me every game.

That wasnt a flea flicker.... that was rico making sure he kept 1m $$$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canales is saying he called the flea flicker which just utterly baffling. Why call that when you have momentum? Why call this when ball security was a huge question mark due to the conditions? Why call a play that had one, maybe two players on a route and neither are going toward the end zone? Given that Canales had called out Legette in a prior game for a lateral that wasn't part of the play, I doubt this was Rico improvising, either.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, poo.  Rico trying to not take a loss to lose his money would make a lot of sense given the yardage and time left.  Nothing makes sense about it being a flea flicker. Location, routes, weather, etc.   

and if true, well that makes me dislike Dave BS post game more and more.   You got to call your player out.  I’m all about dudes going for their incentives and coach’s should want that…..but Rico hurting and sabotaging the team for it and a HC not call it out ain’t it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Oh, poo.  Rico trying to not take a loss to lose his money would make a lot of sense given the yardage and time left.  Nothing makes sense about it being a flea flicker. Location, routes, weather, etc.   

and if true, well that makes me dislike Dave BS post game more and more.   You got to call your player out.  I’m all about dudes going for their incentives and coach’s should want that…..but Rico hurting and sabotaging the team for it and a HC not call it out ain’t it. 

Yea sounds crazy but  that would be the most cerebral thing to do in a mili second oh I’m four yards short of the line of scrimmage let me toss it back lolll.

But Dave being Dave again is the wildest thing I’ve seen since Dave pulled a Pete Carrol earlier this year season vs 49ers we ran a bootleg on the one yard line when Rico had just rushed us down the field then Dave calls a bootleg one 1st DOWN and we all remember how that turned out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tr3ach said:

Watch the replay.  Tmac is in the background of the camera.  He was 10 yards deep and just standing there.   That's not what he would be doing on a flea flicker

Not necessarily. A lot of times on flea flickers you pretend to block for a couple seconds before running deep. 

It looked like a designed flea flicker to me, but I can't say with 100% confidence because I didn't see what the rest of the players were doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • dang, yall are too good.  
    • Point #1: Agreed FA TE is the way to go.  Sanders is a TE2 and Evans is a TE that can easily replace Tremble. Point #2: This gratuitous playoff birth screwed us out of Bailey, for certain, and probably Styles too.  Howell and Hill are the next best ones at their positions based on how most Big Boards are stacking up right now, but a reach currently.  I really think one of the OTs will fall and/or a CB.  Mike Jack is decent, but we could use and upgrade.  Point #3: KC Concepcion in the slot is really peaking my interest.  Point#4: Off ball LB will likely be taken later, I agree.   
    • I don’t think people realize how much our division rivals have done to improve, I don’t think this season is a fluke but I’ve seen nothing to that indicates this is a replicable performance going forward by this team  Dave has been outperformed by his dc who a year ago fielded one of the worst defense in nfl history, and this year had very little resources dumped into that side of the ball  I just don’t get exactly what Dave does that can’t be replaced by any run of mill winning team oc, my hope is if evero leaves we can get a dc that can maybe carry the offense enough 
×
×
  • Create New...