Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Championship Round Playoff Thread


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

I old enough to remember that it wasn't just the impatient owner that wanted those 2 out of here, it was an entire fanbase too.

People wanted Jake out people wanted Cam out people wanted Teddy Bridgewater out people wanted Sam Darnold out people wanted Baker Mayfield out. It's always been this way. Every single one of the aforementioned QB's still had more physical talent than the guy we have now. Nobody with a functioning brain actually wanted to downgrade to the smallest starting QB in the league and trade our best WR to do it too.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

People wanted Jake out people wanted Cam out people wanted Teddy Bridgewater out people wanted Sam Darnold out people wanted Baker Mayfield out. It's always been this way. Every single one of the aforementioned QB's still had more physical talent than the guy we have now. Nobody with a functioning brain actually wanted to downgrade to the smallest starting QB in the league and trade our best WR to do it too.

Don't forget most of us were popping off when Sam initially had a hot start , iirc. Same when Kyle Allen won his first like 4 or 5 games. 

We were calling him "Sam Newton" when he was scoring multiple rushing TDs early in his first year with us lol

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

The Texans are lead by, and act upon a defensive ONLY minded coach.

Not evenly remotely the same as the coaches I mentioned.

The Texans would've been 8-9 this year with Bryce. 

Unless you were one of the torch bearing crowd claiming Bryce would have had the same record as Stroud if all that was different was he was in Texas and Stroud was in Charlotte, it has nothing to do with your claim, other than blind player stanning. Which was the comparison. That what you claim is equally based in fanning not reality. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

The RAMS IDIOT PUNT RETURNER MUFFED THE PUNT!!!! Seattle has the ball near their goal line in a 1 possession game in the third quarter!

That idiot fell BACKWARDS BEFORE the ball got to him lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...