BREAKING: Panthers re-signing Nick Scott

[MHS831]

Get off the ledge--for depth, this is a shrewd move.

Edited 3 hours ago by MHS831

[MHS831]

Now show me R-boom and BC ion cheap deals and call it a free agency

And maybe a DT

And that TE you are looking into

And the punter

And Curhan

 

[flagfootballcoach28]

57 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Get off the ledge--for depth, this is a shrewd move.

That’s a grade I kind of expected tbh. I’m not a huge fan of NS, but he’s not as bad as what the huddle says he is minus the horrible game he had vs the Rams. I’ve always thought he’s often used as a scapegoat. The improved pass rush should hide his deficiencies a little bit better if he’s the game one starter. FS might have to be a position we punt on this year unless Thieneman falls to us at 19. The reality is, you're going to have a few average players in certain spots for a team with as many holes we had before free agency started. You can’t sign everyone. 

Edited 2 hours ago by flagfootballcoach28

[SmokinwithWilly]

[hepcat]

1 hour ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

That’s a grade I kind of expected tbh. I’m not a huge fan of NS, but he’s not as bad as what the huddle says he is minus the horrible game he had vs the Rams. I’ve always thought he’s often used as a scapegoat. The improved pass rush should hide his deficiencies a little bit better if he’s the game one starter. FS might have to be a position we punt on this year unless Thieneman falls to us at 19. The reality is, you're going to have a few average players in certain spots for a team with as many holes we had before free agency started. You can’t sign everyone. 

He’s had so many moments that I look at and say hey, who was that who just gave up that big play? Who just missed that tackle? And if I was blindfolded and had to guess one player on the panthers defense who gave up a big play I would always guess Nick Scott