Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which side of the ball needs more help?


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Chief Keek said:

Defense without a doubt. If one of the top S is available, they need to pull the trigger. Same thing if one of the LB fall.

I'm good with BPA of S, CB or DT at 19

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

I'm good with BPA of S, CB or DT at 19

CB seems to growing as a need--maybe I am just realizing it.  I would be happy with an Edge or OT --but that is just me, I assume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

DT seems like a big need to me.  Hope we take Kayden McDonald.

Glad you said this because this is where I am--question--would you call McDonald a 1 or 3?  I think he could play the DE and we could use Wharton as a change of pace and passing down guy--but I don't know enough about it in relation to Evero's scheme--what say you?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Chief Keek said:

Defense without a doubt. If one of the top S is available, they need to pull the trigger. Same thing if one of the LB fall.

I think--based on value more than need, perhaps, that we will go with a Tackle --either defensive or offensive---early.  I think we could trade back--watch the Ty Simpson action--if he gets by 15, a team like the Cardinals or Jets could move up.  (Save this post and use it against me after the draft.) 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Glad you said this because this is where I am--question--would you call McDonald a 1 or 3?  I think he could play the DE and we could use Wharton as a change of pace and passing down guy--but I don't know enough about it in relation to Evero's scheme--what say you?

Zero or 1 depending on alignment.

Wharton-McDonald-Derek Brown

Bobby Brown and Cam Jackson as your rotations. Imagine that without spending a high pick on McDonald or someone else. Nightmare fuel.

Edited by Swaggasaurus
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

CB seems to growing as a need--maybe I am just realizing it.  I would be happy with an Edge or OT --but that is just me, I assume.

CB isn't lacking much depth, don't forget about Thornton. They were picked apart in the middle of the field and right outside the hash, Wallace and Rozeboom were abused the entire season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I think he is.Daronld more prone to panick ints. I don't hold my breath Everytime Bryce throws the ball. Bryce is a better processor and reading defenses definitely at this point in his career as opposed to where Darnold was. I think he's a better processor right now. Bryce has never had what Is Darnold has had at both stops as in an elite number 1.

Tmac could get there but he's not in the same aid as Jackson Smith or Justin jefferson. I would trust Bryce to win me the game on the last drive before Darnold so I guess I believe he is more skilled than Darnold. We have seen Darnold here and his decision making under pressure wasn't nearly as good as Bryce. If it was he might still be here 

I think you are so biased it isn’t funny. I mean, it isn’t “where Darnold was.” 
Darnold is easily twice the QB Bryce is. Please stop projecting the wishing and hoping and stick to what is. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most people have the same consensus with going Defense 1st but honestly I think this team has been lacking talent for so many years that we could really still go almost any position on the field and truly just keep picking BPA when the Panthers are on the clock. It could be WR at this point or an OL which I would be fine with as long as the impact is immediate. 

Not to beat a dead horse but a QB has to be chosen sometime within this draft.  I really do think BY is so ineffective and inefficient that getting some legit competition outside of just Pickett is a much needed upgrade that DM has to keep up with......  

As far as what I would want is outside a QB is someone who can terrorize an Offensive game planners scheme, so whether that is Safety, IDL or my preference in ILB.  After this successful FA period for once DM has really set himself perfectly to go BPA and keep this momentum rolling into a season where we FINALLY are hopeful for the future.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Glad you said this because this is where I am--question--would you call McDonald a 1 or 3?  I think he could play the DE and we could use Wharton as a change of pace and passing down guy--but I don't know enough about it in relation to Evero's scheme--what say you?

I would go 3 as this guy can get some pressure from there.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...