Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SOJA said:

so I just want to get something off here. 

Is cheating bad? Yes. Should you do it? No

But the amount of blood lust I've seen for people coming after Dianna calling for her to be fired is astounding. People are obsessed with tearing others down but I gurantee all of those people have done poo in their life too and would cry foul play if someone called for their jobs 

I think it’s more the lying and conflict of interest. Is it bad to cheat on your spouse? Yes. But I doubt people would care that much or that she would get fired if it was with somebody random and not somebody that she is supposed to objectively report on and/or somebody that could give her an unfair advantage with insider info. Just standard conflict of interest stuff and lying to your employer about it that makes it a firable offense. It’s like a lot of workplaces: it’s not ideal to have workplace romances, but as long as everything is above board, reported to HR, no major power dynamics issues, etc. then it’s usually fine. But if you’re cheating, sneaking, lying, and somebody could be translating that relationship to a workplace benefit, that’s a problem.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WUnderhill said:

I think it’s more the lying and conflict of interest. Is it bad to cheat on your spouse? Yes. But I doubt people would care that much or that she would get fired if it was with somebody random and not somebody that she is supposed to objectively report on and/or somebody that could give her an unfair advantage with insider info. Just standard conflict of interest stuff and lying to your employer about it that makes it a firable offense. It’s like a lot of workplaces: it’s not ideal to have workplace romances, but as long as everything is above board, reported to HR, no major power dynamics issues, etc. then it’s usually fine. But if you’re cheating, sneaking, lying, and somebody could be translating that relationship to a workplace benefit, that’s a problem.

The amount of couples cheating on each other is too dam high. It's disgusting frankly, its almost like everywhere is like Hollywood was years ago. I don't even want to bring up my time in Fayetteville or talk about housing developments. I just don't understand, my queen is not to be shared, but people stay swinging and its no longer underground.   

 

No one cares about the oath they take anymore. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2026 at 3:06 PM, WUnderhill said:

I think it’s more the lying and conflict of interest. Is it bad to cheat on your spouse? Yes. But I doubt people would care that much or that she would get fired if it was with somebody random and not somebody that she is supposed to objectively report on and/or somebody that could give her an unfair advantage with insider info. Just standard conflict of interest stuff and lying to your employer about it that makes it a firable offense. It’s like a lot of workplaces: it’s not ideal to have workplace romances, but as long as everything is above board, reported to HR, no major power dynamics issues, etc. then it’s usually fine. But if you’re cheating, sneaking, lying, and somebody could be translating that relationship to a workplace benefit, that’s a problem.

I agree, I just feel like there has been so much vitriol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

Counseling for what? I thought he and Russini were in Sedona with a groups of friends???

Lol he is traumatized and needs a safe space. Kraft is hooking him up with counseling right down the street from a stress relieving massage parlor. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...