Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CSR: Panthers focusing on DT at Baylor pro day...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

If the Panthers had already decided to take one of the top DTs in the draft such as Nick Fairley or Marcell Dareus it makes you wonder if they would continue to work out the tier 2 guys. Maybe they are just doing their due diligence but it does seem to suggest as the author points out that the Panthers will try to fill their DT need later in the draft.

Read More: http://www.derp/2011/3/9/2040256/panthers-focus-on-dt-taylor-at-baylor-pro-day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or they are considering trading down. Taylor is supposedly a mid to late first rounder since trimming to 337. 3-4 teams love him as a NT and 4-3 Teams like him too--no way he drops to 65.

We are considering all options. I can tell you that I read speculation that they are interested in Quinn or Peterson in the first, which suggests that they are going to take advantage of depth in the draft at DT, it would seem.

By the way, isnt this about the third draft in a row we swore Hurney would take a top DT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taylor is the best DT is the draft. 6'4 350lbs and runs 5.10... I watched him play, that dude got doubled teamed almost every play and still cause chaos in the backfield. He's a true NT. Only problem is... He gets lazy at times and quits on plays...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be sweet if we ended up drafting Taylor, never heard anything about him being lazy, not saying your wrong ARSEN, just hate to hear something like that, since we've had a DE that took play's off from time to time. Could you imagine Taylor AND Dareus?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the Bevell hire has more to do with adding actual veteran head coaching experience to the staff than anything else. But I do wholeheartedly agree that the obsession in general with Seattle needs to come to an end. I mean we plucked the one guy there to be our GM who turned out to be our worst GM in franchise history in just a few short years and that's really saying something given our history there. Clearly trying to mimick Seattle in any way has not been productive. As far as Idzik many of us have asked the same question but at this point in time it doesn't really matter anymore because Canales is either going to lead this franchise to a winning record or he will be shown the door.
    • Why wasn't here even considered? Better record and save % than any of t he 3 goalies on the US squad.
    • That’s why Bevell is a good move. Idzik might not be chopped liver, he is just inexperienced and even less ready to be the play caller than Canales. I still say the playbook is limited which is a hinderance to calling plays, I would imagine.    Anyway Beavis lol… no Bevell, got to consecutive SBs as an OC and won one with 48 points or something. Should have won the second one. And had several more good years there.    They were the team we had to learn how to beat it took us til the third year I think before we could go into Seattle and successfully compete.   That is glass half full thinking, yep, but that is head and shoulders over what we have had here for a while. Certainly now.     In addition.. It was Canales’ boss. He knew more then , I would bet he knows more now. I can’t look at this as anything but a potential positive thing.  Hell he might be the guy that can look at Dave and say what the fug are you doing? And Dave will listen. I think I can hope for that.  Maybe not.      
×
×
  • Create New...