Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What QB would you like to have backup Cam Newton?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Now that Cam Newton has arrived and has essentially been crowned the new king in Carolina, what QB would you most prefer to backup Cam as he goes through "the process"?

I'm voting Matt Moore - at least we know he's capable of winning a few games, and he's not pickles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb if he can sit on the bench without whining

Would be nice...similar style of QB. But does McNabb really want to sit on the bench, and for how much $$$??? Is he even leaving Washington? They had a shot at Gabbert and traded the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be nice...similar style of QB. But does McNabb really want to sit on the bench, and for how much $$$??? Is he even leaving Washington? They had a shot at Gabbert and traded the pick.

I doubt he'd want to sit. I think Cam wouldnt mind sitting and learning from him. McNabb is good to miss at least 5 games a season anyway. I think the Redskins will look at another free agent QB or draft one today. McNabb wont cost much if he's released no one will pay top dollar for him to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tough question.

Consider the factors:

1. New Coach - Rivera must show improvement immediately. He really needs at least a 6-10 or 7-9 season, minimum, to solidify his reputation. Anything less, and he risks criticism and doubt, something which can be detrimental to his leadership.

2. Our schedule - Worst in the league... even 6-10 is a daunting task which will require our current talent to step up, and any FA QB to be consistent and competent.

3. Our division - Toughest in the league. Atlanta is fairly young. Tampa is very young. New Orleans is a very well managed team and is already making smart moves to keep going strong. We need some awesome talent starting immediately to dent these guys.

4. Our current QBs - Moore is a competent backup. He could even been a decent temporary QB. Not sure what he offers as a mentor however. Clausen is not starting material. Pike is a 3rd stringer. Not looking great for options here.

5. Who's available? - One of the considerations going into the draft was WHO would we take in Free Agency if we didn't take Newton. The answer was pretty bleak. Still is. McNabb is a name getting thrown around... but honestly... there's something wrong with McNabb. He's got a shakey work ethic (not bad, just a little too quick to blame others for his failings). I don't trust him to properly mentor Newton. Who else does that leave? Palmer? Volek?

6. The price of a Free Agent - Money is not an unlimited resource for our team. We've got several Free Agents we have to resign already on our team. Even without a salary cap, it's going to be tough paying a FA QB who's good enough to deal with points 1, 2 and 3 above.

I'd say our best bet right now is to let our current stable compete in camp and preseason and start the best option. UNLESS... there is a QB who suddenly becomes available who we can afford that is a no-brainer pickup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any place that McNabb goes, he has to realize that he's not the future anymore. Perhaps he is ready to accept this realization. I'd test the waters. Nothing says that Newton has to play this year (except injury). Rivera already said, in so many words, that he is not going to throw Cam to the wolves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...