Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chicago police must pay 330k for killing dog in home raid


jasonluckydog

Recommended Posts

A federal jury says Chicago law enforcement must pay $330,000 to a family after officers shot their dog during a home raid that turned up no illegal activity.

Thomas Russell, then 18, opened the door to his home in February 2009 to find police officers with their guns drawn. He asked if he could lock up his 9-year-old black labrador, named Lady, before letting the officers inside. The Chicago Tribune describes what happened next:

Police refused the request and came into the house, the lawsuit said. When Lady came loping around the corner with her tail wagging, Officer Richard Antonsen shot the dog, according to the suit, which alleged excessive force, false arrest and illegal seizure for taking the dog's life.

The cops handcuffed Russell and his 16-year-old brother, and eventually charged Russell with obstructing their operation.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/chicago-police-must-pay-330k-killing-dog-home-200148841.html

The cops should of also been fired and 330k is not enough should of been 3 million. I hate bad cops with a fuging passion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until cities/counties grow some balls and start firing people, poo like this is going to happen.

Whomever did the investigation, the ordering to search, and the actual searching officers should be fired with no access to pensions.

If you want employees to do the right thing, threaten their way of life. No hiding behind unions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this is clearly a case of cops shooting a dog. I would use this in the case against the cops that mowed down a dog in Gastonia if I were the family's lawyer! I think that happened just about a month ago!

The dog wasn't acting agreesively and yet the G-town Police shot it like 6-8 times! (If I remember the what I read correctly.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate when I visit people who have vicious dogs. I would never trust such a savage beast that is easily capable of killing me.

In this case the cop should've let them put the dog up first since they offered. But during a raid you can't really let someone go do something like that, they might destroy evidence.

Complicated scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate when I visit people who have vicious dogs. I would never trust such a savage beast that is easily capable of killing me.

In this case the cop should've let them put the dog up first since they offered. But during a raid you can't really let someone go do something like that, they might destroy evidence.

Complicated scenario.

Like you visit anyone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why bother trolling? I personally found the topic interesting. You should read the article. Maybe you'll have something significant to contribute then.

Why you haven't contributed anything since you signed up, unless you count being pro-rape contributing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem quite obsessed with me. Do you even know what this topic is about? Also I don't recall being pro-rape, just pro-modesty while having an understanding of how the human mind works.

I don't support someone stealing your food but I wouldn't suggest you eat a hamburger in front of a starving Somalian.

Also you reference a post where I commented on the topic and offered a differing opinion which led to further discussion. Compare that to you making off topic comments that clearly contribute nothing and only derail topics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate when I visit people who have vicious dogs. I would never trust such a savage beast that is easily capable of killing me.

In this case the cop should've let them put the dog up first since they offered. But during a raid you can't really let someone go do something like that, they might destroy evidence.

Complicated scenario.

Dog's don't inherently pose a threat. Very few dogs are aggressive, particularly inside dogs. Most aggressive dogs are abused and mistreated or dogs who have gone senile in old age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...