Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Garrard Anyone?


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

I think Andersen showed enough in that last pre-season game to cement him as a capable back up for us. Cam is the starter and bringing in Garrard at this point in the season does very little to help this team.

Always like Garrard. he will be a backup somewhere this year and will probably find a starting gig in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe that some of you would even consider this. What in the hell would we do with David Garrard?

"Hey NFL, Carolina Panthers here. We have a huge hole at DT and a slightly smaller one at corner, but we are gonna go hard after another QB".

Brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, who's saying we need Garrard to start? I'm saying we need Garrard to have depth at QB.

1.Cam 2. Garrard. 3. Anderson.

Way better than...

1.Cam. 2.Anderson. 3.Clausen.

Are the Cam heads afraid of Garrard taking Cams job?! Over reacting much?

Well poo why don't we just sign Patrick Willis to back up Beason while he recovers from his injury?

What, you afraid Beason will lose his job? Because that's the only unrealistic thing about this scenario I've presented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I would love to see him come here, it's not going to happen for a number of reasons.

1. We are in the middle of cuts and have 3 QBs on the roster. There is no way in hell we add a 4th now.

2. Cam is our future.

3. Derek Anderson has ties to Chud. They are buds. He isn't going anywhere.

4. Clausen is a Hurney pick. They get multiple years of trying before being set loose. I'm willing to bet Clausen will be on this roster through 2012.

IF... and this is a big if... Clausen got waived, Garrard might have a chance here. But there are so many teams that could use a starter like him... I doubt we will pay him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dolphins have a QB who, in a new system, has had the best preseason of anyone in the NFL and a backup who, in a new system, has looked very good in his appearances.

I was just thinking that because they only have 2 QBs ;)

I don't mind Moore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well poo why don't we just sign Patrick Willis to back up Beason while he recovers from his injury?

What, you afraid Beason will lose his job? Because that's the only unrealistic thing about this scenario I've presented.

What a silly response and argument, our LB core is stacked. Your point is moot.

Are you seriously saying our QB core is stacked? Because it's not. Consists of 1 rookie that hasn't done anything yet, 1 2nd year guy that is useless and one pro-bowl guy that hasn't done anything since the pro bowl.

Adding depth is not a bad thing at a position that isn't a strength..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...