Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton's Prototype


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

It's been discussed many a time on this board. To whom does Cam Newton most closely compare?

The name that seems to get thrown out the most often is Ben Roethlisberger (that based mainly on his size). Daunte Culpepper is another in that same vein. Michael Vick is evoked for athleticism (don't see it myself) as is Vince Young. Jamarcus Russell comes up on the negative side (not seeing that one either). As far as who people want him to develop into, the names most commonly mentioned are guys like Donovan McNabb and Steve McNair. Others go for the whole "let him just be himself" thing, as if comparing him to someone else was a disservice (it isn't).

I'm gonna suggest, however, that based on what I've seen so far, Newton is in a different mold than the names most commonly discussed.

The names I'd prefer to evoke?

Brett Favre...

John Elway...

...and our old buddy Jake Delhomme.

Newton's not a pinpoint accurate passer like a Peyton Manning or a Tom Brady. And while he's young and coachable, I think it'd be a mistake to try to make him into one. Do you want him to be a pass-first, run-second guy? Absolutely, and you'll most certainly coach him up when it comes to technique, mechanics, footwork and decision making. But you still have to tailor your coaching to his skill set, and that's way closer to a guy like Favre than it is a guy like Brady.

Favre, Elway and Delhomme were all "gunslinger" types. Gutsy quarterbacks who trusted in their arms and in their receivers. No, they might not throw the prettiest passes in the world, and yes, sometimes their receivers had to work a little harder than those the more precise QBs had. Worth remembering also that these guys were all known for fourth quarter comebacks, but those comebacks sometimes were necessitated by early mistakes.

Ball placement accuracy tends to be spotty in these types, as is consistency. A typical game might feature throws that looked near perfect and even borderline miraculous mixed in with throws that looked like something the cat dragged in. Fans watching teams led by this type of QB have tended to ride a rollercoaster between "holy cow" and "what the #@%&" (something Panther fans should know quite well).

Still, more often than not, they get the job done :thumbsup:

To be clear, Newton's arm and athleticism are way closer to Favre/Elway than Delhomme. That's good, because if you're going to make tough throws, it helps if the velocity on them makes them difficult to pick off. Again, the passes might not be pretty, and they won't be as likely to hit a receiver in perfect stride, but "pretty" and "catchable" aren't the same thing, and I'll happily take a pass that's catchable even if it's ugly.

(I'll happily take wins that way too, thank you) :D

So have we finally got our franchise quarterback? If week one is any indication, yes. But people looking for a Brady / Manning / Brees type of franchise guy are barking up the wrong tree. Newton's not that, and trying to turn him into that is as likely to mess him up as it is to accomplish anything positive.

The better move: Take him for what he is, and make him the best he can be in that mold. Yes, it may mean going back to the "Cardiac Cats" style and looking up prices on home defibrillators again, but I can live with that. Just get 'er done.

Truth be told, gut wrenching as it might be sometimes, it makes for some pretty fun memories :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a sort of irony to it :lol:

Generally speaking, people who were calling for a 'franchise QB' during the Delhomme years had in mind a Brady / Manning / Brees / Ryan type (i.e. a surgical precision pocket passer).

Well, The wish for a franchise QB finally came true, but in the form of a bigger, more athletic gunslinger type.

Not much difference to me as long as he wins, but it does give me a bit of a chuckle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does he have to be compared to anyone? He is Cam Newton.

The only 2 people I can honestly say he reminds me of though are big Ben and Josh Freeman. He will be better than Josh Freeman though in my opinion.

We have no idea how is going to be yet. No reason to try to say who he will be like or not be like. Just let the man play and write his own story. We will see in 10 years if he is one of the greatest, out of the league, or sitting on the bench holding a clipboard somewhere. No one knows at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post. I think his placement was maybe a little better than some are giving him credit for, though. There were a few great catches (Lafell and Olsen come to mind) that weren't placed great but there were some passes that were placed perfectly (a lot of the sideline throws to Olsen and Shockey, some of the crossing routes (although some were also thrown a bit high)).

I thought his placement was far better than in the preseason though. For example, the similar plays that were Smitty's first TD catch and the 20+ yard Armanti throw in the preseason. The preseason throw was behind and didn't give Armanti much chance to get YAC. The throw to Smitty wasn't perfect, but it was much better than the Armanti throw.

So while I agree his placement wasn't Brees or Manning like, it was far better than most expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So just because he threw a lot and can throw fast, he's a gun slinger? I don't see Newton as that. I didn't see Newton fitting the ball into tight windows where most QBs shouldn't have thrown the ball. I saw Newton put the ball exactly where it should have been placed. Just because he can throw fast doesn't make him a gun slinger. Based on this game, I saw nothing of that according to your definition of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Scot, This game haunting you? Cant Sleep? heh I mean "Today, 04:44 AM "

Look back at my history and you'll see quite a few posts made at late hours (insomnia).

None of them fit.

Cam's prototype? Cam Newton

No NFL QB has ever had the combination of his size, speed, ability, and leadership.

Not ready to go that far after just one game.

Let's at least let him play a full season before we start talking about all time greatness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • +the #Panthers were more interested in Thieneman than Sadiq +Carolina liked Freeling and Proctor +Idzik stayed up late with Canales to help with prepare for the Ravens offensive coordinator job a few years ago  +Person doesn’t see the scheme changing with Idzik calling plays  +Panthers didn’t see nickel as a priority  +Wheatley probs won’t play nickel  +Bryce Young extension should average 33 million a year https://x.com/josephperson/status/2054547028760248491?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA
    • Yeah lol well the interest isn’t really about seeking stimulation.  I wanted to see how actually bad it was.  And how much of it was women setting him up to be their cash cow.  That is the stuff that leveraged the Panthers into David Tepper’s hands. It is important in that sense.     The worst that I have heard is that he got them in the car and clumsily reached across to help them with their seat belt and made contact. With his arm. That was probably his big slick move. And I can almost guarantee he wasn’t rejected every time. It is easy to picture that action bringing his head close enough to the woman’s head to where he could go in for the kiss if he thought he got the green light.    I really don’t care if JR was a horn dog. We heard all our lives up until the last few years that one of the perks of being really old is that you can flirt with the young women and it is not just tolerated but expected. So he was keeping a tradition alive at some point 😂
    • Well I rubbed some dirt on it and am still here just not optimistic about the future of the QB position. Even what I had accepted as a ceiling raised to an acceptable level turned out to be a bit of a mirage, upon rewatch of the WC game.  Good plays were there yes, but some pretty bad ones too that the good ones late in the game kind of obscured. I have to downgrade that a little.  Especially after rewatching the last 4 plays. I remember the arguments about he did his job the WRs didn’t but that was really just that last muff by Coker I think it was on our final offensive play.   To the future: I know what my level is for paying him and recommitting, but I don’t have any confidence that the team shares my high bar.    But thanks for the pep talk 
×
×
  • Create New...