Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Supporting Cast


Jangler

Recommended Posts

Kind of true tbh. Williams has looked a tad slow. Our run blocking is attrocious. Our defense has been giving up some back breaking plays. We get the most horrible holding plays by the OL at exactly the worst possible moment. Looking from the outside I would say that he doesn't have a supporting cast right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditka just said the reason we are 0-2 because Cam doesn't have a supporting cast. Really? Are these fools watching the games or are they spewing what other people are saying? Could have swore the reason we are 0-2 is because of mistakes and penalties.

Run and defense haven't delivered what they should of for the rookie. Rookie has put the team on his back for 2 straight weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly and we still had a chance to win both games, the Arizona game for sure. So to talk about a supporting cast as the reason is a little silly.

He has a good supporting cast assisting with the passing game.....his supporting cast outside of that has been subpar. d giving up HUGE TD scores....run game non existent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...