Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Hardy's production


rmoneyg35

Recommended Posts

You make it sound like he's on the decline...and he's not even close to his prime in his second year?

"This stage of his career" is referring to the fact that he is young and still learning the position, getting conditioned, etc. He is not yet a finished product.

Don't know why you would be confused by this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm willing to bet that Johnson and Hardy a piece would have about 10 sacks by now if it wasn't for our defensive tackles easily being the worst in the league, allowing QBs to step up in the pocket and avoid the pressure. Maybe not 10 sacks respectively but their totals would be higher. I can't tell you the amount of times I've seen them get great pressure off the edge only for the QB to step up in the pocket because our DTs weren't getting any penetration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy is g impressive for where is he and where we drafted him. DE is not a need because of him and he is young and can get better.

I really believe Hardy thrives under pressure and encouragement, we have yet to see Hardy play under a winning team or at least a dline where we had DTs. I think that will inspire him to unleash the krakan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There are people on this forum that just want to see a lot of passing yards....number go up. That's all it is, really. They are thirsting for a 350-400 yard game. The idea that Jameis Winston is going to come in and play like a star and lead us to wins is ludacris. He's the 3rd fuging string for a 2-5 team and has played horrible for years now. Sure, passing numbers will go up but you'll also get a lot of dumb plays, pick 6's, and incompletions en route to a frustrating bad offensive performance, just in a different way. I think these people are yearning for another Delhomme situation, and the odds of that happening are very very slim. It's way more likely Howell or Jameis comes in and looks like Jack Plummer or Andy Dalton did in the preseason. There just isn't that much good quarterbacking in this league right now. And if we draft another QB in the first round, there is a good chance they bust. It's not a guaranteed carrot. The reality is, as mediocre as Bryce has been, the risk of bringing someone else in in-season and releasing Bryce becuase you aren't happy with his current performance is staggeringly high. Don't want to re-up his contract and search for a solution in the offseason? Sure, I'm on board. Bryce hasn't been good enough to warrant a second contract. But It is very. very unlikely that bringing someone else in midseason is going to give this team more wins.
    • I told somebody that today, the old QB adage. If you have two you don't have one. People forget when we had Double Trouble, there still was a clear edge of carry volume going to D-Lo until his departure. NFL is cut throat and if it takes us eventually bailing on Chuba to feature Rico, that decision may have to be made. 
    • Exactly zero people on the coaching staff or front office are hoping the Panthers get utterly destroyed. This is why people can't take the constant Bryce bashing seriously. Get a clue
×
×
  • Create New...