Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Oh my god aj smith is not franchising vincent jackson


Fiz

Recommended Posts

As CRA just said, Richardson just said that we were not going to sign any big name FAs and that in his opinion, none of them outside of Steven Davis, who had an incentive laden contract, ever meet or exceeded expectations.

I don't care if Jackson played at SD or not, I really doubt we will try and sign him or the other 30 guys that will get multiple threads once FA signings begin.

Despite what some folks think, JR is the ultimate decision maker about who we bring in or not and if he doesn't want it to happen, it won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As CRA just said, Richardson just said that we were not going to sign any big name FAs and that in his opinion, none of them outside of Steven Davis, who had an incentive laden contract, ever meet or exceeded expectations.

I don't care if Jackson played at SD or not, I really doubt we will try and sign him or the other 30 guys that will get multiple threads once FA signings begin.

Despite what some folks think, JR is the ultimate decision maker about who we bring in oor not and if he doesn't want it to happen, it won't.

+1

We will probably sign some FAs on defense for depth, and that's about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I can't bring myself to devote any resources to the offense with the defense bleeding. He'd a good addition, but we need too much help in D.

I expect us to take a look at a bigger name defensive player via Free Agency, though you may see Rivera inquire about Jackson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to invest money into catching our defense up with our offense if we're being realistic. We can have the best offense in football next season but if we have the worst defense then we'll probably still be a borderline team...

See: Packers, Green Bay (2011) and Patriots, New England (2011).

I know, I know...see Chargers, San Diego (2010)...just sayin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between the Pats, Pack, and Panthers is we don't have the experience of a deep playoff run or even appearance. The players up north know how how to execute in crunch time whereas Cam has not yet. Our young offense can't compensate for the defense like NE and GB can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As CRA just said, Richardson just said that we were not going to sign any big name FAs and that in his opinion, none of them outside of Steven Davis, who had an incentive laden contract, ever meet or exceeded expectations.

I don't care if Jackson played at SD or not, I really doubt we will try and sign him or the other 30 guys that will get multiple threads once FA signings begin.

Despite what some folks think, JR is the ultimate decision maker about who we bring in or not and if he doesn't want it to happen, it won't.

That's quite an indictment on the people who have brought in all these free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's quite an indictment on the people who have brought in all these free agents.

I don't know if it an indictment of those who brought them in or a realization that it rarely works that well no matter who brings them in. For example look at Philly who brought in Asomuga for all that money. He seriously underperformed. What about Haynesworth whereever he went or McNabb, Kolb, Peppers among many others. When you pay so much for a guy your expectations are very high. It is hard for someone to live up to the hype and play better than expected.

It seems clear Richardson is against the practice not indicting Hurney for trying to go that route in the past. Some of the biggest FA busts for us were actually guys brought in before Hurney took over as GM. Chuck Smith, Eric Swann, Sean Gilbert among others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...