Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kiper's Latest Mock: Brockers to Panthers


mav1234

Recommended Posts

#9: Carolina Panthers Record: 5-11

Michael Brockers*, DT, LSU

Carolina also has needs at receiver, cornerback and guard, but coach Ron Rivera needs a disruptive force along the defensive interior, and Brockers can be just that. He's a massive presence and strong, quick and aware as a run-stuffer. While he'll never be a great pass-rusher, Brockers has more potential in that area than his college production would seem to indicate.

From http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/page/McShayMock2.0/2012-nfl-mock-draft-defenders-balance-top-10-todd-mcshay-latest-projection

His top ten:

1)Luck

2)Matt Kalil

3)Riley Reiff

4)RGIII

5)Claiborne

6)Blackmon

7)Coples

8)Melvin Ingram

9)Brockers

10)Courtney Upshaw

I've warmed to the Brockers pick but I still feel like I know very little about him; since he played at LSU it's hard to find as many videos of him as it is some other prospects (he split a lot of time from what I understand).

However everyone seems to think he is filled with potential. I didn't think DT would be a good direction to go originally and I am still not convinced, but given the way he has his mock go I wouldn't be upset with this pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/page/McShayMock2.0/2012-nfl-mock-draft-defenders-balance-top-10-todd-mcshay-latest-projection

His top ten:

1)Luck

2)Matt Kalil

3)Riley Reiff

4)RGIII

5)Claiborne

6)Blackmon

7)Coples

8)Melvin Ingram

9)Brockers

10)Courtney Upshaw

I've warmed to the Brockers pick but I still feel like I know very little about him; since he played at LSU it's hard to find as many videos of him as it is some other prospects (he split a lot of time from what I understand).

However everyone seems to think he is filled with potential. I didn't think DT would be a good direction to go originally and I am still not convinced, but given the way he has his mock go I wouldn't be upset with this pick.

I'm hugely rooting for the BPA being d-line, with our first rounder. Hardy showed some potential, but I'm not in love with any of the backups, and if we can build the d-line back to what it was under Peppers/Jenkins/Rucker/etc, we'll be in much better shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My impressions of Brockers (which are not from too much study of him) is that his best qualities are size and strength, he seems to rely on that much more than technique. In a lot of his games he commanded two blockers. He is very aware vs. the run and a lot of times opposing teams run it around him and if they do, two blockers instantly size him up. His downfalls are he couldn't penetrate to save his life and if by chance he got into the backfield he is not a fast DT (in any area really).

He is a pure run stuffer, big body. While I think his potential is really high I still think someone with a bit more speed would be better. Perhaps he can change this in the pros. I can't say It'll disappointing if we take him, but I think he is going to need some time to become really effective, and isn't Fua or Mcclain suppose to be our future run stopper? Also, didn't we sigh Edwards to be a run stopper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My impressions of Brockers (which are not from too much study of him) is that his best qualities are size and strength, he seems to rely on that much more than technique.
he's still really raw and new at DT. the technique is being learned and from what coaches have said he's a quick study. he redshirted his freshman year so that he could work on not just getting bigger, but learning the position. he went into LSU as essentially a OLB/DE hybrid.

he's got the work ethic and coachability to learn the technique. it will come.

In a lot of his games he commanded two blockers. He is very aware vs. the run and a lot of times opposing teams run it around him and if they do, two blockers instantly size him up.
yeah, i do think that this is his strongest suit. he seems to be able to handle them well enough. even if he falls to the ground he's able to take down the RB. that's where his awareness and strength come into play.
His downfalls are he couldn't penetrate to save his life and if by chance he got into the backfield he is not a fast DT (in any area really).

He is a pure run stuffer, big body. While I think his potential is really high I still think someone with a bit more speed would be better.

actually i thought he was pretty fast for a guy his size and for playing the position. he moves really well and is really athletic. that's what most people have noticed about him. just looking at that INT he made will let you know the agility he has.

he's been clocked at a 4.86 40 time, fwiw. generally a 4.9 guy.

as far as penetrating...he pushes the blockers back into the QBs space and gets his hand up. he does quite enough to pressure the QB. he's not one of those guys who will rack up a lot of sack numbers. his strength is in being able to collapse the pocket and rush the QB even if he has a couple blockers on him.

Perhaps he can change this in the pros. I can't say It'll disappointing if we take him, but I think he is going to need some time to become really effective,
he'll be an instant upgrade in the run defense. he'll put as much or more pressure on the pocket than any DT we have right now. and remember, he's proven an ability to pick things up quickly. he comes with a lot of natural talent and ability and a solid drive to get better. you trust his attitude and the coaches ability to get him where he needs to be.
and isn't Fua or Mcclain suppose to be our future run stopper? Also, didn't we sigh Edwards to be a run stopper?
i don't know about mcclain being a run stuffer. fua...maybe. i don't see him having more of an upside than brockers in any aspect.

re: edwards....old and coming off a biceps tear. not sure how long he will last. he will be valuable in helping along whoever we have with him at DT.

point is, if brockers is as talented as people believe and has as much upside as is thought, you don't pass up talent like that because you have the likes of edwards, fua, or mcclain on your roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock has Brockers as his #3 DT. I don't watch college football, so someone fill me in on what it is that is up with that?
mayock hasn't watched either.

he made that ranking without watching any tape. brockers wasn't expected to come out and so people are racing to catch up. mayock is one of them. he doesn't watch much in the way of underclassmen until later. i don't think he had even watched RG3 when he made those rankings either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock has Brockers as his #3 DT. I don't watch college football, so someone fill me in on what it is that is up with that?

A few places have him similarly rated with Still. Generally the scouting sites have him rated 2nd behind Still.

The thing with them is that Still is more polished and more of a finished product, where as Brockers in 2-3 years could be a pro bowl player if developed right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kiper is such an idiot. Not that I disagree with Brockers but for him to say "he'll never be a great pass rusher" is ignorant. Any DT that can get through the middle of the line and get pressure up the middle consistently is automatically a great pass rusher because of the angle. I think Brockers has a lot of potential to be a great DT he just turned 22...

Right now I still think that if Coples does well at the combine then he's the better pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...