Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Couples at Tackle? Discuss.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

I believe that him being able to do it at UNC-CHapel Hill shows that he can be that versatile player in a 3-4 or 4-3 scheme. I honestly believe that he may not be there at 9 for us to pick because of the simple fact that he will have a great combine, and some of those teams picking before us can't afford to pass him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is going to be an IMPACT pass rusher off the edge. Could he contribute inside? Yeah. But that only adds to his value IMO. If he stays motivated and in shape he's going to be a good one. Wouldn't take him off the edge and try to convert him (just draft Brockers if that's your goal) but I would play him in long passing situations on the inside sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C-O-P-L-E-S

why do people keep spelling it wrong? is it that hard to spell.

Coples would be a major reach at 9. The most over-rated player in the draft. He is not good and I don't want him on the Panther's roster.

The simple fact that his EASY name is spelled wrong by the huddle now is enough to warrant the hunch that we'll draft him to be coached by Riviera, to work along side Connor when we RESIGN him. I just hope Steven Smith doesn't punch him in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has been in the NFL 3 years and still looks like a very mediocre QB. Most games are nothing but mediocre plays with a highlight reel every now and then.  He is a very INCONSISTENT QB and it’s very fustrating. He does not deserve a 5th year option, even though the Panthers and all the dumb asses in the front office will give it to him.
    • I’ve rarely ever been more sure of anything than losing out — but how can anyone say with a straight face “Bryce hasn’t improved, but Canales has and he’s masks his flaws”. You have to be so out of touch with reality to put one way above the other when discussing those two. 
    • Last night was the classic example of a visiting team just holding on through the wave of emotion a home team has at the start of a big time game. Bama’s first two kickoff returns really set them back as far as playcalling and allowed OU to dictate field position. The emotion of the home crowd fed into what OU was doing at that point, and it felt like Bama would not be able to overcome that.     Once the kickoff returner was told to fair catch every kick, the game shifted, as Bama wasn’t starting each drive inside their own 15. It was then that Bama was able to make some plays, outscoring OU 34-7 the rest of the way.  I think the last 3/4 of the game proves Bama was the better team. OU was just able to ride the initial wave of emotion to a big lead, but Bama held on just enough.  However, had OU blocked the punt on Bama’s second drive and scored a TD (vice a FG on the ensuing drive), things likely would have been different.  Anyway, Roll Tide!
×
×
  • Create New...